So I may be rivet counting, but...

wsorfan4003 Apr 6, 2013

  1. wsorfan4003

    wsorfan4003 TrainBoard Member

    35
    0
    5
    Okay so I get obsessed with certain things that I can't let go, and one of them is this...

    [​IMG]

    On the front it says SD40 and not SD40-2 on the prototype (which is often sitting by my house) and on Kato's website it says sd40-2, so why is it like this? Sorry but I am probably making mountains out of molehills :teeth:

    http://www.katousa.com/N/SD40-2/index.html
     
  2. Ryan Wilkerson

    Ryan Wilkerson TrainBoard Member

    679
    183
    29
    That's a tough one if the prototype gets it wrong. If I were in charge of the model, I'd try to find another unit that had it right. If that wasn't possible, I'd probably put "SD40-2" since that's what's it is and what is on the big green/white label on the outside of the Kato box. They will probably get less complaints for it as they did it than if they put "SD40" and people said they got it wrong. Just my thoughts!
     
  3. wsorfan4003

    wsorfan4003 TrainBoard Member

    35
    0
    5
    Now I feel like an idiot... The prototype is a SD40-2, however it does in fact say SD40 on the side, it was upgraded sometime after it was produced but I guess that -2 was never put on...
     
  4. ns737

    ns737 TrainBoard Supporter

    722
    135
    26
    rrpicturearchives shows 4002 and 4004 only say sd-40 on both engines. so kato got it from the real engine pic.
     
  5. Dave Schneider

    Dave Schneider TrainBoard Member

    33
    0
    9
    At least it distracted you from noticing how awful the handrails look. It is hard to get a good color match between the painted shell and the unpainted handrails, so in a case like this I would prefer black.

    Best wishes, Dave
     
  6. OC Engineer JD

    OC Engineer JD Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    12,782
    1,114
    152
    You have to remember also alot of times shortline/regionals, (And ever Class 1's), rebuild engines and they are really not what they appear. We have SD40T-2's that are in SD45T-2 carbodies. To look at it you would think it is an SD45, but the proof is behind the doors, hidden from view. Thats why, like ns737 said, its best to go off real photos of a certain locomotive as they are always changing. :)
     
  7. OC Engineer JD

    OC Engineer JD Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    12,782
    1,114
    152
    Heres a good example...
    Ex-SP 7371 was built an SD40...rebuilt by SP to an SD40E...upgraded by ATN to SD40-2. Body remains a straight SD40. Behind it, Ex-SP 2832. Started life as SP 9236 a SD45T-2...rebuilt by SP to 6846....re-motored to SD40-2 standards by UP and renumbered 4800....again renumbered to 2832, still with SD40T-2 specs, still in SD45T-2 body. Hope that hepls some. :)
    [​IMG]
     
  8. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,714
    23,346
    653
    An example is the old Milwaukee Road "GP20" rebuilds. Created from GP9 units, during the process, many had features added which lead unknowing folks to believe the MILW actually owned some GP7 engines, which they did not. Spotting these things can be an interesting part of the hobby....
     
  9. cnw mike

    cnw mike TrainBoard Member

    128
    0
    8
    Could the color issue be attributed to a "light pipe effect"? With a lighter color dye, the plastic might be somewhat translucent.
     
  10. wsorfan4003

    wsorfan4003 TrainBoard Member

    35
    0
    5
    Yes those handrails do look a bit terrible
     

Share This Page