1. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
    So after much mashing of teeth and pulling of hair I have decided on the future of the layout. I have had some motivation issues that have stopped forward progress. I spent a lot of time deciding whether to model the Camas Prairie (and sell off most of my rolling stock/motive power) 1st and 2nd sub or going fee lance. I have decided that running thru freights with a variety of motive power and rolling stock and tailored operations outweighed my desire to model a light traffic prototype.

    I am finalizing some sketches and track diagrams. May still include the 2nd sub as a third deck from Arrow to Stites if I can easily fit it into my current design.

    Was funny how difficult it was to decide. I have done a ton of research on the Camas and could have really done it justice but I figured selling off my rolling stock and motive power that I spent time and $$ on combined with the fact I'm anal retentive and would probably go crazy trying to accurately model the Camas wasn't in the cards. Hope to get back into the train room this weekend.
     
    SecretWeapon likes this.
  2. Eagle2

    Eagle2 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    5,727
    479
    82
    It sounds like you should plant your flag in what I've heard called proto-lancing. Use your chosen inspiration as a base and apply a heavy dose of modeler's license. Good luck!
     
    wombat457 and Hardcoaler like this.
  3. nd-rails

    nd-rails TrainBoard Member

    225
    34
    20
    or maybe gnashing of .....
    Freedom to fly.... d
     
  4. Nick Lorusso

    Nick Lorusso TrainBoard Member

    1,751
    260
    37
    Tony,
    Glad to see you getting back at it.
     
  5. brokemoto

    brokemoto TrainBoard Member

    1,687
    760
    45
    I never did like the term "free-lance", as I always considered it a misapplication. Usually I call it a non-historic. As "proto-lancing" could actually be interpreted any number of ways, I do not mind it.

    I "proto-lance" and have a non-historic. This allows for the running of prototypes of which I was a customer in my younger days as well as allowing for the operation of equipment that these prototypes did not operate.
     
  6. bremner

    bremner Staff Member

    6,297
    6,417
    106
    I can see the need to change plans. I was modeling the Southern Pacific in Arizona during the 1980's, and as much as I love the SP, I always wanted an N Scale Pacific Electric freight railroad...with a little pushing from Joe D'Amato and Arnold releasing an N Scale SW1...well things change.

    I decided to protolance a Pacific Electric branch that was just dieselized and the wires just came down. It is based on a freight line that lasted until 1988
     
    Joe D'Amato likes this.
  7. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
    Still playing with some final details on Lewistown, ID. Trying to decide with adding the down town area with several industries or about 20 feet of main line running. I already have plenty of switching in the yard area. With the main heading north out of town across the Clear Creek River I have an opportunity with going straight into staging and modeling the trackage south into town or the main line crossing the bridge and heading down the snake river. choices choices choices. My lower deck is complete will get to model a bit of Lapwai canyon, Craigmont, lawyers creek trestle and Graingeville.
     
  8. jpf94

    jpf94 TrainBoard Member

    281
    53
    24
    Tony, when you can, would you show us your plan? I'm looking forward to it. With the work you've done before it will be an amazing layout.
     
  9. urodoji

    urodoji TrainBoard Member

    427
    128
    21
    When is your future layout set?
     
  10. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
    1986-87 BN
     
  11. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,063
    27,718
    253
  12. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
  13. TonyHammes

    TonyHammes TrainBoard Member

    1,359
    213
    34
    May be hard to see but these are the plans. Will be a proto-freelance layout. Will be able to get some main line modeling in with some elements of the Camas Prairie. I figure I will have about 8 areas that will be prototypical and I could shoot some photos with BN and UP GPs in the lead and it will pass for the second sub of the Camas.
     
    badlandnp and mtntrainman like this.
  14. Doug Gosha

    Doug Gosha TrainBoard Member

    3,616
    7,749
    80
    Looks great. I believe I am a little envious.

    :D

    Doug
     
  15. badlandnp

    badlandnp TrainBoard Member

    4,587
    16,154
    90
    This one looks like a lot of fun. Your balance of scenery to trackage is great!
     
  16. SirTainly

    SirTainly TrainBoard Member

    322
    10
    22
    Looks like you have a decent space to work with, should be an impressive layout.
     
  17. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,669
    23,135
    653
    Wow. A lot of thought put into those plans. Should be really interesting to follow your progress!
     
  18. rrrover

    rrrover TrainBoard Member

    35
    11
    14
    Well, I protolance the same railroad and area, but as though it continued on both west and east to Butte/Anaconda.My eras are dual - 1950 and 1970. I'm watching your progress with great interest.
     
  19. jpf94

    jpf94 TrainBoard Member

    281
    53
    24
    thanks for posting the plans. I like the direction a lot and yes I can see a lot of 2nd sub Camas potential there.
     
  20. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,063
    27,718
    253
    Looks like a whopper of a layout plan. Who was Camas' original builder? NP? UP?
     

Share This Page