Flangeways and clearances

BoxcabE50 Dec 14, 2022

  1. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,558
    22,732
    653
    What do you folks use as a standard for clearances? I am thinking about such as plank road crossings of (tangent) tracks? Perhaps a piece of styrene? Of what thickness?
     
  2. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    22,014
    27,407
    253
    I think the NMRA standards gauge has flangeways.
     
    badlandnp likes this.
  3. bman

    bman TrainBoard Member

    489
    187
    22
    If memory serves me correctly I used 1mm thick styrene sheet with the width cut so that it fits inside the molded on spike heads in flex track. I'm between layouts atm. If you have a spare piece you can lay it on the outside rail resting on the spike heads the styrene sheet should just below the top of code 80 rail.
     
  4. Mr. Trainiac

    Mr. Trainiac TrainBoard Member

    1,540
    2,131
    46
    yeah, I would reference the NMRA gauge for flangeway thickness. You could also look at the table on the website for back-to-back wheel clearance and estimate a crossing insert width from that.

    In terms of styrene thickness, I would match the rail height, or go a bit less than that if you want to be conservative. If your trip pins are at the correct height, I see no issues with fouling or collisions.
     
    badlandnp likes this.
  5. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,558
    22,732
    653
    Unfortunately, since events of a few years back, mine is one of the tools I had, now MIA.
     
  6. NtheBasement

    NtheBasement TrainBoard Member

    427
    620
    22
    Lessons learned:

    There is enough slop in N gauge standards for wheelsets to move side to side quite a bit. If you make the crossing insert as wide as back-to-back wheel distance as suggested above, the flanges will rub the insert, slow the train and even jerk the car around. NMRA standard flangeway width is .028" + .002 - .001.

    As for height, if you do the logical thing and make the insert as high as the rails, you scrape off the insert's paint or stain when you clean the track. Go a little lower. Same with the approach pavement.
     
    badlandnp and mtntrainman like this.
  7. mtntrainman

    mtntrainman TrainBoard Supporter

    9,982
    10,805
    143
    If you can find styrene in brown or black...you don't have to worry about rubbing off the 'paint'. I have found that the rubbing off of the paint does give it a more 1:1 look of the crossing. Unfortunately white styrene underneath the paint does not lend to a realistic look when the paint rubs off at the edges nearest the rails :eek:...JMO.

    https://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Gab4gl4BQOA/THrKdMOf5oI/AAAAAAAAD2k/xEZdEmpPr9E/s1600/crossing+danger.JPG

    https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/95712a33/dms3rep/multi/Railroad-Gallery-4-b-ig.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2022
    badlandnp likes this.
  8. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,558
    22,732
    653
    I am going to be using laser cut wood, which will be stained. Hopefully that stain will penetrate deeply enough such that rubbing the surface will not deter from appearance.
     
    DeaconKC and mtntrainman like this.
  9. NtheBasement

    NtheBasement TrainBoard Member

    427
    620
    22
    The wood gets lighter over time, sort of like a weathered deck appearance. Much better than white styrene.
     
    mtntrainman and badlandnp like this.

Share This Page