Replace IHC loco wheels.

caellis May 2, 2006

  1. caellis

    caellis TrainBoard Member

    67
    0
    14
    Does anyone know a source for replacing ALL the wheels on IHC loco's.
    The IHC loco's I have are not RP25 compliant(flanges too high/deep).

    They were good runners on code 100 so I would like to convert if not too costly.

    I operate on code 83 track now and have not been able to run my IHC loco's for this reason.

    I would be grateful for any help pointing me in the right direction.
     
  2. mcjaco

    mcjaco TrainBoard Member

    1,163
    77
    28
    I have three IHC Moguls. No problems running them on code 83.
     
  3. caellis

    caellis TrainBoard Member

    67
    0
    14
    Some other IHC owners have told me they have no problem on code 83.

    I have a 4-6-4 Hudson and their Shifter 0-8-0. Both run like they are derailed. The flanges hit the spike heads and really bumpity-bump across the switches. The tender wheels have even bigger flanges then the drive wheels.

    The shifter would be the easier of the two to fix as it only has drive wheels to contend with. The tender could wheels could be replaced.

    Seems like a lot of work. Easy way out would be to replace with new loco's. But what a waste!
     
  4. mcjaco

    mcjaco TrainBoard Member

    1,163
    77
    28
    Perhaps it's the different locos that are the problem. We only have the Moguls so, I don't know about the other ones. The moguls have some pretty hefty flanges too though.

    The IHC locos are good runners that can pull alot so, it would be a waste to get rid of them. Someone must have changed out the wheels or, ground the flanges down.
     
  5. Dave Jones

    Dave Jones TrainBoard Supporter

    1,037
    4
    24
    Caellis - Yes there have been several articles on grinding down wheel flanges on IHC (or former AHM) steamers, all the ones I recall seeing were in "Model Railroader". I don't remember which issues, 'tho Kalmbach may be able to advise you.

    Basically it involved attaching feeds to the locomotive and slowly (emphasize SLOWLY) apply power, then using a large mill file, grind the flanges down very, very carefully.

    I'm surprised though, I thought code 83 track could even handle those NEM flanges!?
     
  6. dingoix

    dingoix TrainBoard Member

    180
    0
    14
    I ordered a 4-6-2. I've got C100 track, but does the Pacific have the *oversize* flanges?
     
  7. caellis

    caellis TrainBoard Member

    67
    0
    14
    I am going to attempt grind down the flanges by using a bench belt sander. The bed of the sander is about 16 inches by 3 inches. I will be using a fine grit.

    I am going to attach DC to the locomotive and have the wheels turning at a medium rate. Something less than the speed of the sander. This will minimize the load on the loco motor and drive train.

    I will place the running loco on the sander with the belt moving towards the engine just as though the engine was on the rails.

    I will try very short, 10-15 second bursts, then remove the engine while the belt and engine are still running.

    I will then turn off both the DC and the belt sander for several minutes as an engine cool down precaution. Also assuring the wheels/axels are also not getting too hot.

    I will repeat this until the flanges are down to where I want them.

    Any ideas/suggestions on this procedure?
     
  8. watash

    watash Passed away March 7, 2010 TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    4,826
    20
    64
    CAUTION CHARLIE !!!

    That belt sander will heat up the metal tires on the wheels so fast you probably wont have time to pull the engine away in time to prevent melting the plastic spokes!

    There used to be two guys who would turn down flanges on their Lathe, but one died.

    It can only be done with a method that allows the tire to remain cool.

    Expect to fill your motor and gears with grinding grit also.
     
  9. dingoix

    dingoix TrainBoard Member

    180
    0
    14
    I'd like to let y'all know, I've been informed the new premier series IHC steamers don't have the large flanges.
     
  10. John Hill

    John Hill New Member

    9
    0
    11
    Hmmmmm- I have this exact same problem with some versions of my LEGO toy trains. I solved it by fitting additional tires, i.e. making the wheels bigger diameter without increasing size of the flanges.

    So, if you can find a tube of metal suitable and a push fit over the existing wheel just off bands and press them on. Is that possible in your situation?
     
  11. watash

    watash Passed away March 7, 2010 TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    4,826
    20
    64
    Press rings over wheels?

    John,
    Yes, it is "possible" to press rings, or bands over wheels, but for use on "scale" engines, this would make the engine stand too tall, and would reduce the pulling power. You would have to turn the taper of the tire face down flat, then turn a tube out to just a light press fit like .00015" to no more than .00020" interference fit, which takes the skill of a Tool and Die maker, or a Manufacturing Jeweler to do. After that, you still have to turn the outside diameter of the new ring down to whatever it takes to make the flange become an RP-25 size. Now you must turn ALL the drivers to this same exact diameter and don't forget to match the original taper too!
    It is not an easy work bench job, like it sounds.
    Few modelers have the lathe, press equipment nor patience and knowledge to perform this operation anyway.

    If they do have a lathe, it is far better to press the tire off the plastic spokes, make a collet to fit the wheel tire, and turn the flange down to correct width and height, then press it back onto the plastic spokes. It still takes some special tooling, or you have to press the whole wheel off its axle, re-gage and re-quarter when finishing up. (And the gear can get in your way too.)

    The problem is the plastic spokes on steamers are easily broken, so you can not just grip the axle and turn the flange on a lathe. The insulated wheel on a diesel is a problem, because it simply spins on the axle.


    Bachmann drivers don't even have an axle, they are just pressed onto the end of a square section cut on the ends of a metal axle, so there is nothing stable to turn them with. When you try one you will find it will begin to wobble, come loose and fall off. Now you have damaged the cavity to where the wheel wont stay on the axle any more. The old Bachman drivers with the round axles, will simply spin like diesel wheels do. Bummer!

    (Pot-metal spokes are not much better for turning either.)


    If you only have one engine, and are still young, then it is "possible" to spend several weeks very very lightly "touching" the flange with a Dremel grinder and work the flange down eventually, taking enough time to keep the tire cool. Most people don't have the patience or skill to do this, and they end up ruining the wheels. You have to re-gage each pair of wheels, and also re-quarter steamer drivers, so it is quite labor intensive.

    People will pay over a hundred dollars for a ready to run engine, then turn around and pay to have it re-painted and decal'd, and pay for replacement couplers, but they balk at paying for the time it takes to successfully turn the flanges.

    For awhile, there was a guy who made an automatic machine that would hold the axle while rotating the pair of wheels with a rubber drive drum, and a slow running sander belt ran across both flanges as they turned in a pan of water. He had an adjustable stop that prevented sanding the flanges too far. He would round off the flanges by hand later. It was slow but accurate, and not too cheap either.

    I thought about making one for myself, then do this work for others, but the manufacturers are coming out with close to RP-25 flanges now, so there is not enough market to pay for the cost of the tooling. Because I have about 60 steamers it was almost worth while for me to make the machine just to do my own engines, but I decided to stay with code 100 rail and not fool with it, when I could spend that time running trains instead.

    You can buy a new set of diesel wheels today pretty reasonable, and steam drivers for around $18.00 a pair, and just toss the old long flange wheels in the scrap yard.

    It was a good idea John, but that's just the way the mop flops today, so far as I know! [​IMG]
     
  12. pjb

    pjb E-Mail Bounces

    184
    0
    19
    Toolbits to recontour IHC/AHM, and related matters

    For what it is worth, the wheels with large thin flanges and sharp angles at web are not
    NEM standard wheels.
    That standard has been modified again in the last
    decade, but the "cookie cutter", wheels found on the
    stuff brought in by AHM/IHC 1950s -70s were not NEM
    standards.
    With nomenclature matters out of the way, and if
    you have hobby lathe ( e.g. Sherwood,Taig,Unimat etc.),
    there are ready made bits for recontourig whatever
    wheels one has. Company's serving model railroad
    hobbyists such as:
    < http://www.Fohrmann.com/ >
    Go to tools for model railroaders section, and look
    them up in index for section. Which is pretty
    similar, I assume, to what you would do at some
    other model railroad hobby tool site.

    Lacking a hobby lathe, and wanting to try it
    without same? This requres constructing a jig,
    and obtaining some handtools that you may not
    own. The elements of your jig are most cheaply
    obtained by using the struts from umbrellas.
    Preferably, from a large man's umbrella, in order
    to get unbent sections or those that can be made
    made horizontal easily. These will eventually
    be secured in fixed mode at the track gauge
    of the track you operate your model railroad
    upon. I clamped them to a piece of 3/4" ply
    so that they did not touch each other.

    NOTE:It is worth noting, that there will be some
    heat generated, and this means you will
    probably not be able to pull this off
    if the locos driving wheel centers are plastic.

    You also should be aware that what you are
    about in this method is a quick and dirty
    method of reducing flange thickness, not
    an aesthetic appearing improvement.

    I have done this two ways, and the fastest
    and trickiest to master used fine grade
    garnet abrasive cloth sold at places like
    HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLs for next to nothing.
    The other used a fine hone , and was slower
    and more foolproof in terms of limiting the danger
    of taking off to much metal. Remember, these
    flanges are made of brass or some form of
    soft alloy, that can be ground off in jig time
    by the unwary.

    The umbrella struts are cut out with a fine
    saw along the outer side and bottom
    changing their 'U' shaped contour for the
    section you will work in to a 'J' contour.
    If you opt for using the
    roll of abrasive (do not use Coarse grades,
    but the finest you can get) cement the material
    to the stut in a 'J' form , leaving the side
    facing out that you have cut away uncoated
    with abrasive cloth. After it sets up you trim
    the cloth sticking up off and you will have the
    bottom of the strut and the back of the strut
    which contacts the driving wheel clad in
    abrasive cloth. You also should smooth the
    sawed edges with jeweler's files or hones
    if they are so sharp or ragged as to pose a
    hazard to your digits.


    To use this jig the engine is
    hooked to a powerpack , sans tender if one is
    involved, and holding it in your hand and
    operating it a medium speed bring it in contact
    with the abrasive in the 'J' shaped strut.
    Originally, I tried this with both struts set
    up for grinding and botched the farside while
    carefully observing the work I was doing near
    me. So while you can do both sides at the same
    time if you have a lot of this kind of work to
    do, and master the "touch"- it would be
    advisable , I think, to leave the strut that
    is away from you merely to help guide the
    work. l


    This principal , by the way, has been used
    to make a professional jig using brass
    forms by people who have reason to work on
    lots of this stuff. I don't do this anymore,
    since it is no longer an issue, but used a
    lithograph printers hone someone gave me,
    the last time I did an IHC product. It was slower
    but did not require the"touch" needed to
    emery down wheels lickety split. You apply
    the hone to the flange bottom in the jig by
    opening the bottom and leaving off the emery
    cloth liner.

    You can get your hone(s), which are extremely
    useful tools, especially if you wish to build in
    brass or other metals cheaply at ENCO.
    < http://www.use-enco.com >
    They are a low cost industrial supplier, but
    sell to noncommercial buyers. Look up hones,
    toolroom polishing sticks, etc. They, and people
    like McMaster-Carr, have a far larger selection of
    of: files, abrasives of all kinds, and so forth, than do
    WALTHERS or similar hobby oriented traders.
    In fact, ENCO will sell you a greater variety
    of emery in all forms than HARBOR FREIGHT,
    but the latter have lots of stores and are not
    online/phone dependant suppliers.

    I hope this helps whomsoever wants to get use
    out of these early products, but you can always
    repower and rewheel such locos if they are
    desirable models (such as the IC 4-6-0
    model of # 462 made in both 'O' and 'HO'
    scale). In many cases these locos are worth
    spending a couple of hundred dollars on
    because they are not obtainable at all, or only
    at far greater cost from other sources.
    Good-Luck, PJB
     
  13. watash

    watash Passed away March 7, 2010 TrainBoard Supporter In Memoriam

    4,826
    20
    64
    Thank you pjb!

    Since I stopped making engines, I lost track of suppliers. It is refreshing to know some are still in business. Especially ENCO, who made my Lathe.

    Do you turn flanges for customers today? Know anyone who does?
     

Share This Page