Request Input on major changes for RochelleSub

DarylK Jul 18, 2006

  1. DarylK

    DarylK TrainBoard Member

    308
    78
    24
    I am requesting input on possible changes to the the Rochelle Subdivision. FOr information on the changes please go to

    www.stpaulrochelle.org/blog

    Daryl
     
  2. GTRail

    GTRail Permanently dispatched

    345
    1
    14
    I like the looks of the new trackplan, would look good IMHO.
     
  3. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    The new Nelson yard will provide longer tracks, and that's always a plus. Looks like you're going for a very open, uncrowded look. That's fine, especially for modelling a western road like UP. I do value mainline length, though, and the new plan is a bit light on along-the-line switching.

    I wonder if there's some way to recapture more of the old plan. Unfortunately, this room is a little narrow for spiral-aisle configuration...

    What's the real-life order of the towns? What's your minimum radius?
     
  4. Tony Burzio

    Tony Burzio TrainBoard Supporter

    2,467
    144
    41
  5. Jim Wiggin

    Jim Wiggin Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    5,258
    6,506
    103
    I think the isle access is better, makes operations easier on the operators. Nelson Yard looks better too.

    Jim.
     
  6. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    238
    125
    I like it. I'm not too enamored of a short peninsula on my layout, so eliminating it will be good. The yard will be much more functional. You'll have more space in the aisles. The one long peninsula should work very well.
     
  7. DarylK

    DarylK TrainBoard Member

    308
    78
    24
    The real order, east to west, is Rochelle, Ashton, Franklin Grove, Dixon and Nelson.

    Minimum Radius is 24 inches.

    Daryl
     
  8. grant-sar

    grant-sar E-Mail Bounces

    330
    0
    15
    I like the changes Daryl. It seems to flow better.
     
  9. OC Engineer JD

    OC Engineer JD Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    12,782
    1,114
    152
    It does have more of a 'Modern' railroad flow to the new plan. I like it! :)
     
  10. keystonecrossings

    keystonecrossings TrainBoard Member

    358
    0
    20
    Daryl:

    While the new tracks at Nelson are much longer, all you've created is a parking lot. There are no switching leads or anything. Would you expand on the concept to make it a working yard or would it remain "visible staging"?
     
  11. DarylK

    DarylK TrainBoard Member

    308
    78
    24
    The yard will definately be a working yard. I was just putting in a yard ladder to see how things might fit into the space. Looks like there should be room for 25-30 car trains in the arrival/departure tracks. There will also be engine facilities, a couple of industries and an intermodal yard.

    Daryl
     
  12. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    If you're planning on that length of trains, then Ashton passing siding will only be able to handle locals. Don't change this. This is the sort of operational limitation/interest I try to design into plans to make towns distinct.
     
  13. John Nutt

    John Nutt E-Mail Bounces

    91
    0
    19
    Dayrl,
    I was watching your DVD of the current layout the other night and I think what you have created is fantastic. Any chance of just increasing the lenght of the yard tracks and leave the layout as is?
     
  14. SecretWeapon

    SecretWeapon Passed away January 23, 2024 In Memoriam

    5,121
    3,788
    103
    Hey,
    There's never enough yard trackage. So the more you can get,take it.I'm sure whatever you decide,it will be outstanding !!!!!!!!!!
     

Share This Page