Thoughts and Opinions on Con Cor's Upcoming New Coupler?

subwayaz Jul 15, 2010

  1. subwayaz

    subwayaz TrainBoard Member

    3,222
    106
    44
    I received a email the other day about a new Con Cor N Scale coupler that will be coming out soon. It is supposed to be compatible with MT couplers.
    What are your thoughts on this new product??
    Picture below is New Con-Cor Rigid Jaw Coupler (Left), Micro-Trains (Right)
    I think this might spur some competition :tb-wink:
    Should be interesting
     

    Attached Files:

    • -1.jpg
      -1.jpg
      File size:
      60.8 KB
      Views:
      120
  2. Metro Red Line

    Metro Red Line TrainBoard Member

    2,497
    712
    47
    WOW, Con-Cor?!?!

    So now Bachmann, Walthers and now Con-Cor are ditching cRapidos for good in The Year 2010. Like the fall of the Berlin Wall, you are witnessing a revolution, folks.
     
  3. daniel_leavitt2000

    daniel_leavitt2000 TrainBoard Member

    1,356
    21
    32
    My first thought is of the death of the Rapido. Con-Cor, Model Power and Bachmann finally came aboard the knuckle train over the past two years. With companies starting to body mount couplers, we may finally see some real improvements in tracking and coupling.

    My seccond thought is that while these couplers are fake, IM's dumby couplers were a really great product. They were the first high quality 100T trucks with knuckle couplers and the price was right. If Con-Cor can capture that magic, it may have a niche role in the market.

    The drawings listed on their website show that Con-Cor is finally upgrading their trucks. Now this is much more important to me. We may get a new inexpensive, highly detailed 70t toller bearing truck with metal wheels AND short coupler boxes. Throw in McHenry or Accumate couplers in the box and you can have a really nice truck for half the cost of MTL or Accumate trucks.

    So while these may not be as explosive an anouncment like BLMA's awsome trucks, or Accumates when they were anounced in 2000, these may find a useful role in N scale. I could find myself purchasing a few packs to replace trucks on MDC cars, but I wonder if the days of stand alone truck/coupler packs are coming to an end since no one produces cars with Rapidos and few modelers purchase resin car kits.
     
  4. Traindork

    Traindork TrainBoard Member

    1,299
    393
    35
    I'll buy some when they come out to check them out. I don't care to have working couplers, just couplers that'll hold a train together. It'd be nice to see the death of the rapido coupler.
     
  5. BarstowRick

    BarstowRick TrainBoard Supporter

    9,513
    5,679
    147
  6. Pete Steinmetz

    Pete Steinmetz TrainBoard Member

    735
    6
    22
    If they are short shank, I'm in. I don't need operating knuckle's on most of my cars.
     
  7. Westfalen

    Westfalen TrainBoard Member

    4,094
    33
    55
    If they come in short shank versions they might be useful for close coupling IM F units.
     
  8. Inkaneer

    Inkaneer TrainBoard Member

    4,349
    1,518
    78
    First, Concor's coupler will have the same problem as the McHenry's. That is, without a coupler box it is relegated to the replacement of existing couplers. Second, I would have liked it better if Concor came out with a semi automatic coupler rather than a dummy. Lifting one coupler over another to couple two cars together is time consuming and tedious expecially when doing unit trains. With the semi automatic you just push them together. Third, get rid of the fake trip pin.
     
  9. Flash Blackman

    Flash Blackman TrainBoard Member

    13,326
    503
    149
    Thanks, Concor

    A shorter shank would allow closer coupling.

    I like the McHenry except for the left-to-right coupler swing allowed by the coupler box. That excessive swing makes the McHenry unusable for my purposes of backing long strings of cars. I continue to use Micro Trains because of the short shank and the restricted swing motion of the coupler in the coupler box.

    I certainly welcome the Concor innovation. New ideas usually always help. This diagram above seems to indicate that the Concor coupler will also have this large left-to-right motion.
     
  10. Jim Reising

    Jim Reising In Memoriam

    1,598
    758
    45
    If this had come from anyone but Con-Cor I'd have hope. Given their track record...
     
  11. N&W

    N&W TrainBoard Member

    990
    0
    20
    Nevermind ;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 15, 2010
  12. pastoolio

    pastoolio TrainBoard Member

    1,627
    289
    35
    Too bad it's the same size as a MT. :(

    Mike
     
  13. ge-maN

    ge-maN TrainBoard Member

    32
    0
    8
    Looks nice though I don't like the thought of body mounted couplers.:thumbs_down: IMHO, the ability of truck mounted couplers to handle sharp radii is one of the pluses of N sale. I do micros and body mounted couplers just won't do. I've run standrad 40ft N truck mounted couplered rolling stock around 6" radius curves. If we move down the road to body mounts, I can see N scale having to have a much room needed as HO. :tb-mad:

    N scale, - tiny railroads with sharp radii for small spaces or long trains on huge sweeping curves. Take away the ability to make small railroads and we might as well be in HO again.:munhappy:

    Re the death of the Rapido, well, I like them.:thumbs_up: I run, don't switch much. They are bulky, over sized, simple, but folksy and they work for coupling and holding a train together. Grafar sliced them in half and they still work well and are compatible with full sized Rapidos. As long as these new couplers are truck mounted, I suppose eventually I'll have to move to them if I want to add new rolling stock.

    Remember, no matter how we dress them up, they are still toy trains.
     
  14. CSX Robert

    CSX Robert TrainBoard Member

    1,503
    640
    41
    I don't see how you figure that. Body mount is pretty much the norm now in HO scale, so moving to body mount in N scale will still mean that it will take about half the room of HO.
     
  15. Inkaneer

    Inkaneer TrainBoard Member

    4,349
    1,518
    78
    N scale started in Europe and is only now starting to shake off its European influence. The Rapido coupler was developed as a low cost functional coupler with no intention of being prototypical. In fact the prototype Euopean l coupling system could not be modeled. Now even Bachmann is introducing their own type of automatic knuckle coupler [looks similar to a McHenry]. So we may be witnessing the demise of the Rapido. That, however, is not to say that truck mounted couplers will go the way of the Dodo bird too. I suspect they will still be around years, even decades into the future.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 17, 2010
  16. oldrk

    oldrk TrainBoard Supporter

    3,700
    186
    51
    i have hundreds of rapido couplers I just couldnt throw away. Maybe they will become so rare the stash I have will become valuable and make me rich!!!
     
  17. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    237
    125
    Keep dreaming, Rick. I chopped mine done to a bare "H" for close coupling the cars of unit trains.
     
  18. ge-maN

    ge-maN TrainBoard Member

    32
    0
    8
    CSX Robert.

    You may have a point.:tb-wink:The 9 3/4" radius N track may be okay for body mounted couplers. Havn't seen any at the LHS but if I do, I may get a couple and experiment as to how small a radius they will take. The smallest radius I every tried was 4" with a small switcher and Atlas ore cars. No Problem.:thumbs_up: I know body mounts woiuld never take that. When in HO I got down to 12" radius but that was about as small as I could go with body mounted couplers and that was a stretch.:tb-rolleyes:
     
  19. jdcolombo

    jdcolombo TrainBoard Member

    1,183
    269
    31
    The limit on radius for body-mounts depends on the length of the car. You can run up to 50' boxcars on 9" curves with body mounts without trouble (I do), but anything longer than that will create some problems. I suspect you could run a 33' twin-bay hopper with body mounts around a 6" curve.

    John C.
     
  20. FloridaBoy

    FloridaBoy TrainBoard Member

    802
    1
    22
    Since the Unimate couplers are virtually gone with little or no promise of resurrection, we need a budget coupler that fits everywhere, fits tightly, straight and is compatible with all of the major knuckles out there. Like Unimate did, at one time 8 for 2 bucks.

    Ken "FloridaBoy" Willaman
     

Share This Page