Bachmann EZ track vs Kato Unitrack

Stormovic Jan 4, 2005

  1. Stormovic

    Stormovic E-Mail Bounces

    15
    0
    13
    Which one is better?
     
  2. Brett C. Cammack

    Brett C. Cammack TrainBoard Member

    109
    0
    17
  3. atsf_arizona

    atsf_arizona TrainBoard Supporter

    1,811
    184
    39
    I'll second what Brett says. No question, Unitrack is better.

    Unitrack has a much wider selection of curved radius's, turnouts, crossings, short and long pieces, feeder tracks, integrated remote turnout motor, turnout controllers, etc.

    Have a check at the free Kato Unitrack brochure on their web site:

    www.katousa.com

    And also check out the Yahoo Kato Unitrack group:

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/KatoUnitrack/

    Hope this helps!
     
  4. sam

    sam TrainBoard Member

    216
    0
    16
    head to head...
    no competition....
    kato unitrack 1...
    b-mann e-z track -1...
     
  5. Hoochrunners

    Hoochrunners TrainBoard Member

    285
    6
    20
    I would only use the Bachmann stuff for static shelf displays. Ok, no I wouldn't. Kato is the only way to go.
     
  6. LongTrain

    LongTrain Passed away October 12, 2005 In Memoriam

    803
    0
    19
    I prefer Unitrack for this type of track.

    Unitrack has greater variety of components, so you can do more without having to cut the pieces up. There are curve radii from 8" to 28" that I know of. (I don't know if the 8" is sold in the states or not.)

    Unitrack has bridges and elevated trackage.

    Unitrack has a rail alloy formula that seems to work like magic in my environment. I only clean track once or twice a year.

    The Unitrack switches are route selective, so on a small layout, you can use the track switches for block control, and run your layout with just two power wires if you want to.

    The Unitrack connectors/rail joiners are replacable.

    Unitrack is not as realistic as flex on roadbed with separate ballast, but it looks more realistic to me than EZ-track.

    I do wish Unitrack came in longer straight sections, though. [​IMG]

    So, I agree it is worth the extra money. You may not agree, and that's OK, but at least now you know why I think so.

    In any case, it is your railroad. You should use what works best for you.
     
  7. Calzephyr

    Calzephyr TrainBoard Supporter

    4,153
    1,149
    74
    Bachmann EZ= Yugo
    Kato Unitrack= Honda
     
  8. Len

    Len TrainBoard Member

    140
    0
    18
    I don't use it myself, but every report I have heard agree on one thing. Unconditionally reliable. If I had a considerable amount of trackage in tunnels, I would use the unitrack for that application.

    Len
     
  9. loco1999

    loco1999 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,308
    0
    25
    Unitrack good.

    [​IMG]

    Loco1999

    Please suggest 16.25" and 17.50" radius curves to Kato at www.katousa.com
     
  10. jacobmarley

    jacobmarley TrainBoard Member

    136
    0
    16
    I have used code 80, EZ track and Unitrack. I used EZ track for some time as a "snap track" because it was what the most convenient LHS carried. There is no comparison of UniTrack to EZtrack. The joints are 100 times better. The switches are 1000 times better. When I finally stopped screwing around and made the plunge to Unitrack, I thought "Why did I even stick to N scale if my trains didn't run like this?" It is amazingly smooth and sure. EZ track is not.

    Although if you want some EZ track, I have about 500 feet of it and 25 switches in my attic in a box. :D
     
  11. Powersteamguy1790

    Powersteamguy1790 Permanently dispatched

    10,785
    11
    115
    Stormorvic:

    The JJJ&E is an all Unitrack layout. Unitrack is the only way to go.

    Stay cool and run steam.... [​IMG] :cool: :cool:
     
  12. steamghost

    steamghost TrainBoard Member

    814
    15
    20
    Stormovic,
    Another vote for Unitrack here, so you'll save yourself from grief and aggravation and do what you want to do, run trains. Check out the sets if you want a nice starter package.

    Alan
     

Share This Page