Creel to Trudeau: “The Time For Rhetoric Has Passed”

William C. Vantuono Feb 21, 2020

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. “Canadian Pacific is severely impacted by the ongoing blockades across our rail network that began on Feb. 8, 2020 in support of the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs,” Creel wrote to Trudeau on Feb. 20. “The continuous and widespread disruption with no end in sight is creating critical safety and security concerns. CP supports the Wet’suwet’en in its request for dialogue with the Prime Minister. I call on you to engage immediately in a direct dialogue with the Wet’suwet’en Hereditary Chiefs.

    [​IMG]

    “Today, Secwepemculecw members near Chase, British Columbia, blockaded our western corridor. This blockade severs our rail access connecting the Port of Vancouver, Canada’s largest port, with the North American supply chain and the Canadian economy. In addition, for the past 12 days, CP’s rail network has been blockaded by protesters at the Kahnawá:ke Mohawk territory, south of Montreal. This blockade has severed vital rail connections into Atlantic Canada and the United States. I support the offer made today by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to move their officers away from the area where the Kahnawá:ke Mohawk Hereditary Chiefs have been opposing a pipeline on their traditional territory.

    [​IMG]

    “CP has acted honorably through direct and respectful engagement with our Indigenous partners. We fully understand their frustration, and we support their desire for a quick resolution. The time for rhetoric has long since passed. Resolution requires action now.”

    [​IMG]

    Creel’s letter was shared with Julie Payette, Governor General of Canada; Chrystia Freeland, P.C., M.P., Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs; Marc Garneau, P.C., M.P., Minister of Transport; Carolyn Bennett, P.C., M.P., Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations; Marc Miller, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indigenous Services; Bill Blair, P.C., M.P., Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness; and Ian Shugart,
    Clerk of the Privy Council.

    “It may only be a matter of time before the protests and blockades are aimed at rail lines serving the oil fields in North Dakota and elsewhere in the U.S., especially in light of this week’s pipeline news,” comments Railway Age Contributing Editor Bruce Kelly. “Beyond that, I wonder when other crude oil or coal protesters will become emboldened to interfere with rail shipments headed to the U.S. West Coast, Gulf Coast or East Coast in the same manner as what’s been happening in Canada—or worse.”

    Economic Impact


    “This is more than just a railroad problem,” Railway Age Contributing Editor and FreightWaves columnist Jim Blaze notes. “Taking today’s FreightWaves’s Daily Watch SONAR-based analysis one step deeper, the protesters are statistically striking a huge economic blow to Canada’s economy. It’s all somehow connected.

    “Railroad disruption caused by relatively few citizen protests are a huge and daily accumulating economic hit to Canada’s economy. The overall scale can be calculated. For rail alone, the revenue hit mathematically is about C$40 million per day. Converting that to just CN’s revenue, after discounting for unaffected traffic, it equates to gross revenues of perhaps C$20 million per day, and a net operating profit loss or deferral of C$8 million per day. In lost railroad employee wages, it’s a possible C$300,000-plus per day range, for 1,000 people. Overall shipper/business community supply chain logistics disruptive costs—considering that transportation is in the 9% range of distribution costs—might exceed C$150 million per day. All of this adds up to a figure approaching C$200 million a day.

    “Those are pretty big national potential ‘hit’ numbers, and there are serious consequences. As well, what are the comparable economic damages to the protesters? And how is all this being balanced in a legal/political context?”

    [​IMG]

    The post Creel to Trudeau: “The Time For Rhetoric Has Passed” appeared first on Railway Age.

    Continue reading...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page