EOT, FRED or a Guy Possibly Named Fred...

Akirasho Mar 25, 2021

  1. Akirasho

    Akirasho TrainBoard Member

    1,440
    5,293
    58
    RMartin, badlandnp, BoxcabE50 and 7 others like this.
  2. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,133
    3,938
    183
  3. gmorider

    gmorider TrainBoard Member

    1,145
    2,010
    43
    My conductors are always in cabooses. (y)
     
    Mike VE2TRV and Hardcoaler like this.
  4. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    6,574
    19,094
    104
    Although it looks like I might see a radio on him, I'm guessing he's just a foolish trespasser with no reflective vest and his foot resting on the drawbar?
     
    BNSF FAN likes this.
  5. BNSF FAN

    BNSF FAN TrainBoard Supporter

    7,468
    13,738
    123
    You are probably right but is it possible this is a shot from pre safety vest days?
     
    Hardcoaler likes this.
  6. RailMix

    RailMix TrainBoard Member

    1,274
    2,695
    49
    I may be mistaken, but I thought riding the drawbar was a huge safety violation.
     
  7. Mr. Trainiac

    Mr. Trainiac TrainBoard Member

    1,221
    1,348
    31
    That photo looks to be from the 'good old days' of pre-2005 at least: I don't see any FRA reflective stripes on the cars. The guy is probably an employee, there looks to be a radio handset hanging on his shirt.

    I have always called them FREDs. EOT could be anything, even a flag, but FRED is specific to the electronic flashing device. I'm not sure how crews feel about them, but I did hear them having trouble with one on the scanner the last time I was railfanning. Not having a rear crew on the train means the conductor has to walk the entire way. I'm sure a caboose would have been handy there. In the days of PSR, I think conductors are doing a lot of walking.
     
    badlandnp, Kurt Moose and Mike VE2TRV like this.
  8. Akirasho

    Akirasho TrainBoard Member

    1,440
    5,293
    58
    He is an railroad employee and the time period sounds right. Didn't mean to "out" him, but photo is probably 10+ years old at least, maybe more.

    Now, more FREDs...

    Train-EOT003.JPG
    Train-EOT022.JPG
    Train-EOT019.JPG
     
  9. rch

    rch TrainBoard Member

    301
    684
    29
    ETD and FRED are used pretty much interchangeably where I work. I see EOTD in some company literature from time to time but I don't know anyone who uses that term.

    What surprised me is that where my brother works up north they have a name for the head end device on the locomotive (Mary). Not sure how that came about but when you are connecting the FRED to the HED you'll first input the FRED ID number. As soon as you have communication with the FRED you can arm it. When we see there's a pressure reading on the rear we say, "Fred's talking" around here but my brother reports that "Fred is talking to Mary."

    FRED had a big impact to the bottom line early on in terms of crew reduction, but it also helped usher in fuel savings. Engineers who have been around a lot longer than I have can feel free to add, subtract or correct anything I say here, but I'll break it down as I understand it.

    When cabooses were used on every train the engineer had to consider the crew on board the caboose when it came to operating the train. Even on cabooses equipped with cushioned underframes or EOCC slack run-ins could be violent and could cause harm to the rear end crew. On grades and territory that permitted it, the easiest way to control the slack was to set a minimum reduction and simply drag the train with the brakes set. This is still the way we handle the train on certain areas where the terrain undulates and there's no other way to control the slack.

    Around the same time cabooses were being replaced by FRED dynamic braking was becoming more effective. The dynamic brakes on a set of SD40-2s could help you slow the train down as long as you set air, but you'd have to be on a fairly light train to have the dynamics do most of the work. But once the SD60s and Dash 8s showed up the dynamics became much more effective. Without a crew on the rear of the train to consider, engineers only had to control the slack enough to keep the train intact, not keep the grumpy conductor's coffee from spilling.(y) And since a negligible amount of fuel is consumed to operate the dynamic brakes compared to the fuel consumed by pulling a train around with 6-8 lbs of air set the operating department was quick to embrace a new set of train handling rules and guidelines. Dynamic brakes are so effective now there are limitations on the total number of effective dynamic brake axles we can have online for the train.
     
    badlandnp, gjslsffan, Sepp K and 6 others like this.
  10. Mike VE2TRV

    Mike VE2TRV TrainBoard Member

    2,931
    3,674
    70
    That's a great explanation, Ryan. I like hearing about the ins and outs of train operations. It's educational and entertaining.:cool:

    I'm no conductor, but I do get grumpy if I spill my coffee. Especially the first one in the morning...:coffee::mad:

    :D
     
  11. Akirasho

    Akirasho TrainBoard Member

    1,440
    5,293
    58
  12. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,133
    3,938
    183
    That would be ironic if it was running long hood forward and the FRED was the leading as the foremost safety device. :confused:
     
  13. Akirasho

    Akirasho TrainBoard Member

    1,440
    5,293
    58
    … this unit was running long hood forward. I think the move was between two local yards (maybe 4 miles apart).
     
    badlandnp, Kurt Moose and Mike VE2TRV like this.

Share This Page