News Rumors Marklin was Sold

EMD trainman Jul 19, 2009

  1. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    To all Marklin fans of all scale, there has been news rumors posted on the internet from good sources the company has been sold to a company caled Kader. This news of course right now is unofficial and can't be confirmed at this time.
     
  2. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    I did some research and found out that the Kader Toy company is based in Thailand which makes stuffed animals and plastic dolls for Matell and Disney
     
  3. Gats

    Gats TrainBoard Member

    4,122
    23
    59
    Kader is the parent company to Bachmann, I think.
     
  4. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    More Info on Kader Toy Company

    Kader Industrial Company Limited was founded by Mr. Ting Hsiung-chao in 1948. He had previously established the Wei Ming Flashlight and Battery Works and the Pau Chiu Light Bulb Factory, both successful businesses in Shanghai before 1949.
    Mr. H.C. Ting believed that success is built upon diligence and
    a dictum that nothing short of perfection was acceptable.

    Being an unusual entrepreneur, Mr. H.C. Ting not only designed his own products, he also developed the machines that made them to streamline processes. Kader's products carried the "OK" logo, a trademark devised by Mr. H.C. Ting to emphasize the reliability and quality all products made by the Company.

    Kader started as a manufacturer of plastic flashlights, a logical complement to Mr. H.C. Ting's dry cell battery business. Leveraging on the machinery, the Company soon diversified
    into manufacturing plastic household goods. Marketed under the "Fortune" brand, products ranged from simple and colourful combs and rulers to plastic cups, bowls, plates, chopsticks, poker chips, eyeglasses and cigarette boxes.

    Kader entered into toys in 1954. By the late 50s to early 60s, the Company already offered a complete line
    of plastic toys and models. Kader also started manufacturing for major foreign brand names during this time. In 1969, the Company's products won three of the top eight Gold and Silver Medal prizes during the 33rd Annual Packaging Competition sponsored by the American "Variety Department Store" Magazine. Under
    Mr. H.C. Ting's leadership, Kader became known for its fair pricing and fine products.


    In the 70s and 80s, business from foreign clients continued
    to expand, leading the Company to produce such famous products as the original Star Wars figurines, Teddy Ruxpin and Cabbage Patch Kids. The Company also started its Mainland operations, opening its first factory in the border town of
    Shekou in 1983.

    The move allowed Kader to overcome labour supply constraints in Hong Kong, making room for further growth. Led by sons
    Dr. Dennis Ting (currently the non-executive Chairman of Kader Holdings Company Limited) and Mr. Kenneth Ting, the Company was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 1985.
    From the 1990s to the present, while continuing to manufacture for major foreign brands, Kader started to pursue opportunities in the model railroading industry as well. The Company acquired Bachmann Brothers, Inc. in 1981, Liliput in 1994 and Williams Reproductions in 2007, as well as launching the Bachmann Branchline and Bachmann China brands in 1989 and 1999 respectively. Through these acquisitions, Kader was able to transfer the technical know-how of manufacturing sophisticated models to vastly enhance moulds and products across all manufacturing divisions. Between 1996 and 2008, Kader's products won more than 27 "Model of the Year", "Manufacturer of the Year" and many other awards sponsored by Model Railroader, BahnProfil, Eisenbahn and other various magazines and industry organisations.

    Over a span of 60 years, the small operation has evolved into a multinational conglomerate. Looking to the future, Kader continues to be committed to Mr. H.C. Ting's business philosophy. The Company is dedicated to provide fair pricing, superior service and high calibre products for all our clients and customers
     
  5. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    Gats, now there is something I never knew. Kader owns both Bachman and Williams Trains. Now supposely Marklin / LGB adds to the line up.

    On another G scale note. Walthers has a limited amount of LGB that was produced and shipped out by Marklin before the bankruptcy notice, but it seems to be mostly track and switches.
     
  6. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    Seems like Kader has been buying up alot of train manufacturers up. Here is November 2008 news of more companies Kader purchased.

    Breaking News: Kader acquires Sanda Kan

    An agreement has been reached allowing model railroad manufacturer Kader Manufacturing Trust to purchase Sanda Kan Industrial, according to industry sources.

    Hong-Kong headquartered Kader owns the Bachmann, Williams, Bachmann Branchline, Graham Farish, Liliput and Bachmann China brands and manufactures products for them at its facility in China’s Guandong province. Sanda Kan, also based in Hong Kong, manufactures model trains and accessories at several facilities in mainland China and has made items for Athearn, Atlas, Hornby, Life-Like, Lionel, Marklin, and Walthers, among others.

    According to industry sources, Kader views the acquisition more as a merger of the two companies, with Sanda Kan operating as a separate entity and retaining its current management
     
  7. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    The one thing that keeps coming up when I researched the Kader Toy Company is there was a aweful fire at the factory in 1993, here is one of many articles I found on this subject.

    Thai toy factory fire: 10 years after the world’s worst industrial inferno


    On May 10, ten years ago, the worst factory fire in history took place at the Kader Industrial toy factory on the outskirts of the Thai capital of Bangkok. Officially 188 workers, most of them young women from impoverished rural families, died in the blaze. Another 469 were injured; many seriously and permanently, after they were forced to leap from second, third and fourth floors of the buildings to avoid being burnt to death.
    Hundreds of workers were packed into each of the three buildings that collapsed. There were no fire extinguishers, no alarms, no sprinkler systems and the elevated walkways between the buildings were either locked or used as storage areas. The buildings themselves were death traps, constructed from un-insulated steel girders that buckled and gave way in less than 15 minutes. Those who attempted to flee through the narrow ground floor exits found them jammed shut.
    There were many reactions to this terrible tragedy. The international media barely mentioned the fire. Inside Thailand, however, there was widespread anger. The toy factory, owned by Thai, Hong Kong and Taiwanese investors, was symbolic of the exploitation associated with globalised production. Major toy corporations such as Tyco, Kenner and Arco faxed their orders to Kader, complete with the detailed specifications required to market the goods in the US and Europe. None of them had the slightest interest, however, in the safety standards, wages or conditions for the factory workers who produced the plastic-moulded toys.
    The International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI) recognised the significance of the disaster and dispatched a reporting team to Thailand to investigate. A series of articles, which initially appeared in the newspapers of the ICFI and was later published as a book Industrial Inferno: The story of the Thai Toy Factory Fire, detailed the immediate causes of the fire, allowed survivors and the victims’ families to speak, and exposed the official cover-up and the inaction of various trade union leaders.
    More fundamentally, the articles pointed to the underlying changes in world capitalist economy that made such tragedies inevitable. The previous worst industrial fire—at the Triangle Shirtwaist factory in New York in 1911—became the focus for struggles by working people that succeeded in placing limited restraints on the operations of capital. But under conditions where globally mobile investors were not tied to a particular country, let alone to one factory, the prospects for such piecemeal reform had become nil.

    “Companies such as Kader Holdings need to move their operations rapidly to take advantage of the newest areas of low-cost labour. That it why the Kader factory outside Bangkok was never intended to be a permanent structure. Cheap shoddy buildings, which failed to meet even the minimal Thai construction requirements, were simply packed to overflowing with workers and machines. Elementary safety precautions were deemed to be unnecessary overheads.
    “Thailand’s limited building and safety codes, minimal wage levels and factory regulations are not enforced. Indeed, the government in Thailand attracts foreign capital to its shores by openly advertising the lack of restrictions on the exploitation of workers. The Kader factory was no aberration. All the horrors of nineteenth century European capitalism—child labour, dirty and unsafe working conditions, shanty housing—are on display everywhere in Bangkok.” (1)
    In contrast to those often well-meaning groups and individuals in Thailand and elsewhere who argued that it was necessary to pressure governments for change, the ICFI concluded that the working class could only make advances to the extent that it grounded its struggles on a global perspective aimed at abolishing the capitalist system of exploitation.
    “In semi-colonial countries such as Thailand, the working class has no hope of gradually improving its conditions, as was the case in the United States, following the Triangle Shirtwaist fire in 1911. From the outset, the hundreds of thousands of peasant youth drawn from the poverty-stricken regions of Thailand to labour in the factories of Bangkok face the necessity of developing a unified strategy with workers in neighbouring Indochina, China and around the globe.” (2)
    What has been the balance sheet of the last 10 years?
    Far from improving, a decade later the conditions facing workers in Thailand and other Asian countries have significantly worsened. The myths of the Asian economic miracle collapsed in the 1997-98 financial crisis, which threw millions into unemployment and poverty overnight and vastly increased competition for foreign investment. The former Asian “tigers” vie with each other in an obscene contest to demonstrate to global corporations that theirs is the cheapest, most disciplined and convenient workforce.
    The level of industrial accidents has continued to rise throughout the region. Last year the International Labour Organisation lifted its estimate of work-related deaths from 1.2 million annually to 2.3 million. Of these, half take place in Asia, with nearly half a million in China alone.
    In Thailand, 10 years of pleading with government officials and politicians for minimal factory safeguards have produced nothing. Various trade unions, non-government organisations (NGOs) and labour activists have pinned their hopes on the establishment of an Institute for Occupational Health and Safety funded by the government but operated with their input. Plans for the institute are currently languishing in parliament, with no sign that they will be approved in the near future.
    Even if such an institute were to materialise, its impact would be negligible. Government and private corporations would treat it with the same contempt that they have meted out to the victims of the Kader fire over the past decade. No major changes have taken place in the government departments responsible for factory safety in Thailand. Nor have any of the senior officials directly involved in approving the Kader factory’s construction or overseeing its operations been prosecuted.
    A comment in the Nation newspaper on May 1 noted: “Safety and environment standards in the factories are generally low. A senior official admits that only 10,000 plus factories can be inspected each year while there are 300,000 factories nationwide. Meanwhile, a wishful foreign labour expert said this was a good reason for organising more unions to ensure occupational health and safety. But then with union membership stalled at 3 percent for a decade now, what is to be done?”
    The Thai legal system has finally rendered its verdict on the Kader fire. Immediately after the blaze, one of the factory workers was made the scapegoat. Police arrested Viroj Yusak, alleging that he had caused the fire by carelessly discarding a cigarette. A court in Nakhom Pathom last month sentenced him to 10 years jail but acquitted 14 executives, including the factory’s managing director, an engineer and a shareholder, of all charges. The only legal recognition of Kader Industrial’s culpability was a fine of 520,000 baht ($US12,300).

    Charoen Phokphand Group (CP)—the largest business conglomerate in Thailand with tentacles in many different ventures—initially denied any involvement in, or responsibility for, the Kader fire. Under pressure from the victims, their families and supporters, CP was eventually forced to acknowledge its connection to the factory and to pay minimal compensation.
    A decade later the money is drying up, leaving many of those affected by the fire in poverty. Sampan Tochalerm, 46, who was paralysed from the waist down, has used up her 200,000 baht ($US4,740) in compensation and her 2,000 baht monthly allowance will expire in another decade. She is worried that she will be left with nothing but the money she gets for medication to treat the sores that cover her body.
    Carpenter Sukhon Lamchon, 51, told the Nation that the 100,000 baht in aid that he received after the death of his wife in the Kader fire went to pay for her funeral. Since then he has faced financial difficulties, as his wife was the main breadwinner and he is forced to look after his son who is in poor health. Apart from odd jobs, he is reliant on his son’s 1,800 baht monthly allowance.
    The Thai-based NGO, Friends of Women Foundation, recently concluded a study of 59 families who lost members in the fire. Of the 92 children, 62 percent faced chronic financial and family problems. Although the government pledged at the time to waive school fees for the children of the victims, that has not taken place. A number of spouses admitted to regularly contemplating suicide.
    Last Saturday a number of the survivors, the families of victims and other supporters gathered at the site of the Kader factory to mark the tenth anniversary of the tragedy. Labour Minister Suwat Liptapanlop, who turned up to the commemoration ceremony, had nothing to offer those in attendance other than his support for a proposal to set up a monument. “It should remind us of safety in the workplace,” he tritely told his audience.
    The experiences of Thai workers over the 10 years since the Kader fire have confirmed the futility of attempting to pressure ministers and governments to mitigate appalling conditions in the country’s cheap labour sweatshops. More broadly the working class in every country—economically advanced, as well as backward—has confronted the collapse of all those parties and organisations that, in the past, claimed that the interests of workers could be advanced within the framework of a nationally regulated capitalist economy

    The chief lesson from the Kader fire for the working class in Thailand and internationally is the need for a new political perspective grounded on a conscious understanding of global economic processes that produced the tragedy. In every country, workers confront the same class enemy—globally mobile capital—and can only defend their rights by starting to unify their struggles internationally around a program aimed at establishing a world planned socialist economy
     
  8. Robbie

    Robbie TrainBoard Member

    73
    0
    18
    Kader also owns Aristo-Craft.

    However, Aristo and Bachmann are allowed to act as separate entities--hopefully if Kader has indeed bought LGB, then the LGB quality will be applied to Bachmann and Aristo products.
     
  9. Benny

    Benny TrainBoard Member

    1,251
    1
    33
    Think otherwise. Bachmann Quality control will be applied to the LGB line. Bachmann quality control relies on the consumer to identify those pieces that don't operate up to speed and to return them for exchange, making it very effective becasue a large number of defective units never come back.

    What this means is you might be able to get $100 dollar sets of LGB much like you could once get $100 Big Hauler sets.
     
  10. EMD trainman

    EMD trainman TrainBoard Member

    1,735
    5
    26
    Robbie, Kader owns Aristocraft also? Wow, never knew that one either. Seems like Kader has bought out alot of brand name model train manufacturers over the years.

    Benny, I remember those Bachman big hauler sets only going for $100, thats how I got started in G scale. There is a common problem already on the Bachman K-27 that I see from visiiting other forums, the screws on th drive wheels are coming loose which could damage the motor.

    As far as I'm concerned Bachman is still bottom of quality list, but for those who can't afford a Accucraft K-27 do have another alternative, Kader smart in marketing in that respect.

    Special Note: Hartland Locomotive Works is the last reasonably priced G scale manufacturers left that still produces right here in the USA
     
  11. DragonFyreGT

    DragonFyreGT TrainBoard Member

    991
    60
    22
    Kader doesn't own AristoCraft. Last I checked they were owned by Polk Hobbies. And I'm fairly sure that Aristo is still a family owned business. Can we get a confirmation on Kader owning them?
     
  12. Benny

    Benny TrainBoard Member

    1,251
    1
    33
    Kader does own something like 33% of Hornby, which in turn owns rivarossi and a nuber of other old European Brands.

    Yes, Kader is Number One in World Wide Toy Train sales [because Trains are in the Toy and Game industry]
     
  13. sumgai

    sumgai TrainBoard Member

    188
    180
    20
    I like Bachmann because, as one poster said above, they readily exchanged a GE 44 tonner G Scale loco that went south soon out of the box. They did the same recently for an On3 loc that should have never escaped the eyes of QC. It does cost postage one way to make this happen though.

    I dislike Bachmann because soon after I paid Dealers list on the GE 44 tonner, the next couple (hundred) of containers of them were blown out at distress sale prices by Bachmann.

    I don't like the way they fixed the shay problems with the trucks after Long term out of warranty failure: here first gen buyers, buy this new pair of trucks for $125!

    Moral of the story, wait for 2nd or 3rd gen Bachmann products, after they have saturated the must have market place and then begin dumping their excess production.

    I feel sorry for USA and Aristo-Craft, because, after following their story's, I got the impression that there was just one big factory in the new territories of Hong Kong, run by Sanda Kan. One day they did a batch of Bach, one day they did a batch of USA and another day they did a batch of AC. If Kader owns everybody but USA trains and Aristo craft, there is less incentive to produce a competitors product now?

    Good bye LGB and Marklin German product. I shall miss them greatly.
     
  14. DragonFyreGT

    DragonFyreGT TrainBoard Member

    991
    60
    22
    LGB Isn't dead yet. We'll have to wait and see what happens.
     

Share This Page