I am new to this hobby and I am about to start building my benchwork - thank you all for your ideas and guidance in designing it. My benchwork is targeted for basic completion by end of February. Now, the more I read, the more I am starting to think about my investment in track. I will be working in HO with DCC (I have a Digitrax Super Empire Builder Xtra). Initially I planned on using Bachmann E-Z track NS, and I have made a minimal investment in it. I have no other brand of track at this time, but I see many, many, people use Atlas Code 100 and Code 83. I understand that Atlas track will require cork and ballast. Bachmann does not. The requirement for ballast is not a deciding factor. My question to you wise advisors is: Which is a better investment plan? My layout is roughly 30" wide and runs the outside of a room that measures 10' by 12' with a 3'x3' peninsula. Should I keep my E-Z track for my test track and build my layout with Atlas, or should I continue on with E-Z track and only use select pieces of Atlas as required (bridges, etc)? This is a long-term plan and the layout will certainly be modified over time. I am looking for flexibility, adaptability and ease of consistency in running. Appreciate your advice. .. James
In HO I would go with the Atlas switches and flex track. It will allow you to have a bit more freedom in how you arrange the track. Also you will be able to get curved switches from Shinohara that will work with the Atlas track....Mike
