Was going to the post office when I saw these sections sitting next to some switches at a local crossing. Not quite sure what UP is up to, but I won't take any gruff from anyone about using sectional track. . Now, here is where they could have used a Unijoiner. I know, they aren't supposed to be connected, just couldn't resist.
The tie spacing and rail size look so prototypical, has to be either Atlas C55 or ME C40....:cute: Seriously though, the use of tie clips certainly has made track panel assembly in the factory, or track laying in the field much more efficient. The major expense for railroads is replacing all the MOW spike handling equipment with clip handling equipment throughout the system.
Not really sure. They were doing some work a couple weeks ago on their bridges nearby, maybe these are from that.
The use of longer ties (10'?) makes me think they are for a crossing that will use concrete panels. Regarding the photo of the mismatched rail ends, I'm guessing those will be shimmed into alignment and welded together.
That is what I was thinking when I pondered the possibility earlier. The photo angle with those longer ties makes these panels look like narrow gauge track.
I hadn't realized the illusion in the photo. Yes, those are standard gauge, with wider ties. And, yes, I was just making a joke about the misaligned rails, the two sections were just laid end to end on uneven ground. No signs about upcoming roadwork anywhere near them, but will watch to see.
There is a photo spread on the below listed page putting a track section into place at a crossing in 1991. Just scroll down a few photos to get to it. http://madisonrails.railfan.net/photo1988.html
