A few HOn3 items...

cf7 Jun 12, 2011

  1. cf7

    cf7 TrainBoard Member

    435
    14
    22
    Here are a few of my HOn3 cars that I've been working on. I am equipping them with Kadee 178 couplers, the scale size whisker couplers with the small box. They work very well with no slinky action. To me, they look better and have a lot more detail than the 714 HOn3 couplers do.

    The stock car is a Rail Line kit with Blackstone trucks and Microscale decals..

    [​IMG]

    The tank car is a Precision Scale kit that I also built..

    [​IMG]
     
  2. cf7

    cf7 TrainBoard Member

    435
    14
    22
    A few end shots...

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    I still need to add brake hoses to the tank car.
     
  3. TetsuUma

    TetsuUma TrainBoard Member

    1,247
    14
    20
    Those look awesome! The black on the tank car looks really faded and it sets off the patch.

    I was thinking about N scale couplers for HOn3. I've not compared them to their HO scale counterparts but after seeing those 178s, I will have to give some consideration to that plan as well.

    Andy
    Tetsu Uma
     
  4. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,687
    23,234
    653
    Good choice. Those couplers do look nice. Really add to the completed models.

    Boxcab E50
     
  5. ArtinCA

    ArtinCA TrainBoard Member

    901
    218
    24
    Those look good Chuck!
     
  6. cf7

    cf7 TrainBoard Member

    435
    14
    22
    Thanks y'all for the kind words. The pictures are bit washed out; I need to get used to the new camera!

    Andy, the D&RGW used standard gauge couplers on their equipment. The scale size of the 178's work out great and they look right.
     
  7. TetsuUma

    TetsuUma TrainBoard Member

    1,247
    14
    20
    I was more wondering how the 178s compared to N scale couplers with regards to size in the general sense, not specific application per se, but a quick check with a ruler shows N scale couplers to be about 2mm tall. That scales out to less than 7" scale inches in HO. I guess 178s are the way to go.

    I keep going back to look at the tank car photo. You really nailed it!

    Andy
     
  8. cf7

    cf7 TrainBoard Member

    435
    14
    22
    I think maybe I should back track a little about the no slinky action thing. At
    the time I did my testing with the Kadee 178's, I was using standard gauge HO
    cars that, of course, weigh more. They performed awesome. But on the lighter
    HOn3 cars, there is a bit of it that is noticeable due to the slack in the
    knuckle and the light weight of the cars.

    This has not dampened my enthusiasm for these couplers though. I have them
    installed on my C-16, front and rear, and they look and operate just great. I
    am pleased.

    I guess what it all boils down to is that they LOOK great. I am, however, going
    to try to weight the cars a bit more to see if that helps.

    Sorry about that!
     
  9. ArtinCA

    ArtinCA TrainBoard Member

    901
    218
    24
    I think I would go with more weight as well. My HOn30 cars and locos are using Micro-Trains 1015 couplers cause there isn't a problem with slinky.

    Besides, heavier cars will give you an excuse for a helper! :tb-biggrin:
     

Share This Page