And just like that, Years of EMD production come to an end in Canada.

YoHo Feb 3, 2012

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    Proving that once again, Caterpillar does not mess around with unions, EMD London is being shut down. All production is moving to Muncie at much lower salaries.
     
  2. BestSnowman

    BestSnowman TrainBoard Member

    35
    0
    7
    it's terrible that people are loosing their jobs but wages have to stay in check with market forces. Caterpiller isn't a charity... They need to be a profitable company.
     
  3. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    Um, did you see Capterpillar's financials from last year?

    I assume not, because if you had, then you'd know that they were crazy profitable last year.
     
  4. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,687
    23,234
    653
    Was that Cat as a whole, "crazy profitable?" What about subsidiaries looked at individually? Was Progress Rail doing well? Was EMD itself?

    At least it's coming to the US. They could ship it all overseas to their operations in India and China.
     
  5. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    It is remarkably unlikely, bordering on impossible for a manufacturer of such equipment to be profitable as an overseas industry. Especially with GE breathing down their necks. The shipping costs destroy the savings.

    My impression was that EMD and progressive were doing OK, that EMD in fact has been steadily improving it's bottom line, BUT, they can't meet GE on price or quantity. At the same time they were saddled with the same type of union contract GM struggled with. It was after all a GM contract.

    However, the 50% cut in pay was way more agressive than required. Classic Caterpillar hardball.
     
  6. friscobob

    friscobob Staff Member

    10,534
    714
    129
    Sucks for Canada, but as was mentioned earlier, it isn't going overseas.

    I'll refrain from comments on labor unions, since such subjects are best left for other forums. But, Cat is doing what it feels it has to do to make EMD viable as a locomotive manufacturer, plus give competition to GE. We don't have to understand or like what Cat is doing.
     
  7. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,687
    23,234
    653
    As I thought I understood the facility, it was not a true "manufacturing" plant. They did what is described these days as being final assembly. Which should mean basically assembling a kit from parts and subassemblies sent via other outside sources. Just like Boeing does for airplanes, "US" auto makers do (have done for decades) for vehicles...

    If our RR manufacturers can export their finished products across the oceans, why cannot the same be true from overseas to here? Isn't one reason GE can stay in the picture due to some items coming up from south of the border? We get so much else the same way for other consumption here. Passenger and light rail equipment, autos, buses, trucks, electronics, etc, etc. Why would railroad engines be excluded from the possibility? I'd bet if there is profit potential, that some astute business person or entity would find a way to sell it.

    Oh well. We're building plants for everything in Mexico at breakneck speed anyhow. My wife's younger brother spends his days picking up those loads at that US border and dragging them to distribution points within the southern US.
     
  8. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    There was a recent article on the NY times about the manufacture of iPhones and pads in China. One of the things you learn is that part of what makes the savings possible is that all the sub contractors are within miles of each other. You can literally get any part you need within a 10 mile radius. American auto manufacture and locomanufacture work the same way. The furthest distance would be 710 engines from lagrange and AC components, the only big item that comes from overseas.(assuming they didn't open a us facility like most do.) The vast majority of locomotives are made for the us market. Why incur transport costs for items weighed in tons that can't be shipped in containers. Sure, when british rail operators want a quantity that can be counted on your fingers, you ship, but we're talking hundreds of units.
    Also, a member of my model club is a german who works for seimens he is here to build light rail transit engines in a facility in Sacramento, just because it is not reasonable to ship them for large quantities. How many foriegn automakers have plants in the us and use US supply chain? Almost all of them. China only makes sense if it fits in a 40' container.

    Some parts are made south of the border and some export work and overflow assembly goes there, but the odds of it all moving to mexico in the near term are low.
     
  9. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    I generally agree, but wanted to point out that having grown up in Illinois and seen the workers pricketing in peoria and generally learning about Caterpillar's tactics over the years, it's well known that they have a reputation of being ...hard on unions. They're reputation is that no other company in the US treats unions the way they do. So I'm judging them based on their history, not based on my opinions of unions. They are known for going after the unions for more than just competitve reasons. It is their reputation and that's all I refer to.
     
  10. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,687
    23,234
    653
    And that is the bottom line.
     
  11. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    I will say no more on the ins and outs of labor negotiations, but in theory, doesn't this apply to the union and employees as well and everyone really. Also, it assume that none of the actors are nefarious. Not that I think Caterpillar is per se', but there are jerks in this world and many of them are in boardrooms.

    Again, not to side with anyone, just pointing out the realities.


    My company had a previous CEO that laid off thousands, the 2 CEOs since have wished he hadn't. He was not considered to have had the interests of the business at heart.
     
  12. RhB_HJ

    RhB_HJ TrainBoard Member

    163
    0
    9
    It is the usual race to the bottom. The "take it or leave it" bargaining position of a 50% wage and benefit reduction would most likely not sit well with any of us on this board, would it? But it should be good for GE, they should be selling even more of their engines into the Canadian market. Strictly on merit, naturally, since they do have a superior product.

    Note: I never belonged to a union, but I can easily understand how they came about. North America would otherwise still be in the Dark Ages with serfs, slaves and bare subsistance living. OTOH from what I read, see and hear we're on the way back to those "good old days". People have a hard time getting by and even a harder time doing the math!
    As always strictly my opinion!
     
  13. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,687
    23,234
    653
    The math few seem to see is that most if not all of those people instead took a 100% cut in pay and benefits.

    This thread has veered way, way off the required topic of railroading...
     
  14. friscobob

    friscobob Staff Member

    10,534
    714
    129
    Please refer to a comment I made in a previous post:

    I'll refrain from comments on labor unions, since such subjects are best left for other forums



    I suggest this is advice best heeded by all concerned.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page