AZL New Release Preview Photo

ztrack Apr 4, 2009

  1. RobertAllbritton

    RobertAllbritton TrainBoard Member

    348
    47
    20
    Oh, you guys mean these perhaps??? :tb-biggrin:
     

    Attached Files:

  2. SJ Z-man

    SJ Z-man TrainBoard Member

    3,018
    1,027
    62
    Nice Rob ! My box is already full of fully weathered UPs. Maybe I can get 2 more in there, not 4. Maybe I can set aside 2 of the others . . . yeah, that will work. OK, I can get a box of 4.
    .
     
  3. zfuture

    zfuture TrainBoard Member

    214
    79
    21
    40' PFE Wooden reefer

    We are reviewing the first test shots. Take a look!
     

    Attached Files:

  4. BNSF Dash 9

    BNSF Dash 9 TrainBoard Member

    537
    0
    16
    I WAAAAANT!!!!! :tb-biggrin::thumbs_up:
     
  5. JR59

    JR59 TrainBoard Supporter

    1,699
    141
    32
    Definitely a must behind the Challenger. Thanks for sharing Hans.
     
  6. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Looks like I can go ahead and start building that National Orange Packing House now that I will have some stuff to park in front of it.

    Joe
    MTl
     
  7. SJ Z-man

    SJ Z-man TrainBoard Member

    3,018
    1,027
    62
    The end detail looks sharp with lots of individual components !!
    .
     
  8. wslco

    wslco TrainBoard Member

    49
    0
    10
    Hans--what is the prototype for the wood side reefer? I can't find any of the PFE cars that match your model. It sort of looks like a R-40-18 but not quite because the corners are to square and the placard is in the wrong location. It can't be a -19 because the roofwalk is wood and not steel mesh. Thanks.
    --Steve from the other Phoenix
     
  9. Joe D'Amato

    Joe D'Amato TrainBoard Member

    1,749
    352
    38
    Steve I thought you were going to change you signature to : "Steve, the other White Meat" :eek:)

     
  10. Z_thek

    Z_thek TrainBoard Member

    536
    7
    28
    "I can't find any of the PFE cars that match your model."

    It looks like an R-40-24, or a rebuilt R-40-23. They had so many variations, especially during and after WWII.

    Lajos :0)
     
  11. wslco

    wslco TrainBoard Member

    49
    0
    10
    Lajos--R-40-23 and -24 were steel side cars, had steel running boards, notched side sills, and a fan shaft and control box. Otherwise it's a match! (-:
    --Steve from the other Phoenix
     
  12. Z_thek

    Z_thek TrainBoard Member

    536
    7
    28
    "Lajos--R-40-23 and -24 were steel side cars"

    Except this one. Possibly a few hundred more just like this, and some rebuilts too.

    Lajos :0)
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  13. zfuture

    zfuture TrainBoard Member

    214
    79
    21
    40' reefer

    The upcoming 40' wooden reefer is in a way generic and will represent several railroads and companies. It is however very close to specific PFE reefers.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. wslco

    wslco TrainBoard Member

    49
    0
    10
    Lajos--you da man (-: Only the -23 had the equipment I listed. But Han's answer as to what the prototype was used begs a new question. Why would a company that makes a Cab Forward (SP equipment) and a Challenger (UP equipment) do new tooling for a wood side reefer and not use a PFE (SP/UP owned) car as the prototype. The worst part of this is that the reefer isn't even a Santa Fe prototype. It's based on no prototype, it's just something someone made up.
    --Steve from the other Phoenix
     
  15. ztrack

    ztrack TrainBoard Supporter Advertiser

    2,193
    816
    50
    Steve,

    Isn't this an easy answer? The difference is between brass and injection. Every manufacturer makes compromises on injection models in order to find middle ground that allows them to offer the most versions in a fashion that closely matches the prototype. MTL did that with the passenger cars. Full Throttle did that with their cylindricals. Don't even get us started on cabooses. Now if AZL did go the length and create just an ATSF prototype, you tell me that there wouldn't be complaints that it was not accurate when a SP/UP version was released?

    If you want AZL to offer a line of brass reefers with accurate details, it can be done. But it will have a price point to match. But I am a big fan of brass cars. FR was actually working on a brass wood sided reefer at one time.

    I do applaud AZL since they really try to match prototype details on their injection molded locos such as the GP7s and SD70s. But freight cars are a real challenge. There are just too many different versions and variants.

    I truly can't find fault in any manufacturer taking this approach. It is good business sense.

    Rob
     
  16. wslco

    wslco TrainBoard Member

    49
    0
    10
    Rob--your missing the point. AZL could have done a PFE reefer in plastic just as easy as making up a generic car. They could have then decorated it for many other roads. But PFE was the largest, by far, of all the reefer companies, and AZL is doing an engine that pulled large blocks of PFE cars. As you state, every MTL car is based on a prototype. The AZL car matches no know wood side reefer. By the way I was not saying they should do a ATSF reefer and decorate it for PFE. That would be pure heresy (-:
    --Steve from the other Phoenix
     
  17. ztrack

    ztrack TrainBoard Supporter Advertiser

    2,193
    816
    50
    Steve,

    No I am not missing the point. True, AZL could have done a steel sided PFE reefer, but Pennzee already has these cars. I know AZL did not want to reinvent the wheel on this one. AZL did contract with Pennzee to offer PFE reefers when they released their GS3 and GS4 freight sets in 2004. Recent attempts to contact Pennzee have fallen on deaf ears. AZL has taken another approach with the wood side reefers. They are giving the Z community a new car style based a wood side reefer.

    Frankly looking at the AZL car compared to the photo Lajos posted, I see only two main differences. First is the two rungs on the left of the car and the small board to the left of the doors. I am not a reefer expert, but if these two items are the only differences, than I say we are good to go.

    Rob
     
  18. HOexplorer

    HOexplorer TrainBoard Supporter

    2,267
    3,220
    70
    Rob, I'm ready. When can we expect this cars? Cheers, Jim CCRR
     
  19. wslco

    wslco TrainBoard Member

    49
    0
    10
    If they change the trucks, add a steel underframe,and make the roofwalk steel mesh it's close. I just expect better things out of a company that prides itself on accuracy.
    However, you really must learn to read. I never mentioned anything about AZL making steel side reefers.
    --Steve
     
  20. Kurt Moose

    Kurt Moose TrainBoard Member

    9,873
    14,375
    147
    Put a big Great Northern "Goat" on the side of it, and I'll buy a couple!!:teeth:
     

Share This Page