Brunswick MO Washout

ddm502001 Oct 3, 2019

  1. ddm502001

    ddm502001 TrainBoard Member

    134
    123
    17
    BoxcabE50 and Hardcoaler like this.
  2. ddm502001

    ddm502001 TrainBoard Member

    134
    123
    17
    This was what they were dealing with prior

     
    BoxcabE50 likes this.
  3. sidney

    sidney TrainBoard Member

    175
    88
    4
    they should just blast it or get one of them wood shredders that eat whole trees like it was nothing. ive seen them eat forest like nothing....
     
  4. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    60,932
    5,766
    651
    Wow. That is an unreal amount of debris!
     
  5. Point353

    Point353 TrainBoard Member

    2,089
    1,285
    44
    And whose problem will it be next once the debris gets shifted from one side of that bridge to the other and continues flowing further downstream?
     
  6. ddm502001

    ddm502001 TrainBoard Member

    134
    123
    17
    Not so much a issue now, that bridge is GONE pilings and ALL.
     
  7. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    5,071
    11,665
    88
    Perhaps NS was able to monitor the stability of the bridge while crews worked to remove the debris, but in retrospect, that appears to have been a very hazardous assignment.
     
    ddm502001 and Kurt Moose like this.
  8. Kurt Moose

    Kurt Moose TrainBoard Member

    5,900
    3,554
    103
    Serious hazard pay on that job!:confused:o_O
     
    ddm502001 and Hardcoaler like this.
  9. Rip Track

    Rip Track TrainBoard Member

    106
    80
    12
    I'm thinking that too. I wonder if the amount of dead timber has been compounded by the number of trees that have been destroyed by beetles in recent years. We sure have a lot of dead trees here in the Ohio valley.
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  10. Point353

    Point353 TrainBoard Member

    2,089
    1,285
    44
    Video of the bridge collapsing and being swept away:

     
  11. Kurt Moose

    Kurt Moose TrainBoard Member

    5,900
    3,554
    103
    Holy crap!!
    They must've cut the rails near the ends of the bridge, cause I was waiting for the rail to fly thru the air!!
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  12. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    60,932
    5,766
    651
    I was thinking the same as Kurt. Expecting more rail to be pulled away. They must have pulled some bolts at the joints, or something.
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  13. mmi16

    mmi16 TrainBoard Member

    289
    118
    20
    What a futile response - one that had absolutely no chance of success with the volume of debris that had accumulated.
     
    ddm502001 and BoxcabE50 like this.
  14. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    60,932
    5,766
    651
    Perhaps the new bridge will be not only stronger, but a few feet higher?
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  15. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    5,071
    11,665
    88
    Why do people consistently hold their cell phones vertically for horizontal format shots? :rolleyes:
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  16. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    60,932
    5,766
    651
    Probably for the same reason they stand there and talk or curse enthusiastically, as the train is passing. Or stand right next to their video camera, and bang away with the SLR, which is quite audible.... They aren't thinking. :(
     
    ddm502001 and Hardcoaler like this.
  17. HemiAdda2d

    HemiAdda2d Staff Member

    18,593
    7,865
    232
    Wow, what a snag of trees.
     
    ddm502001 likes this.
  18. mmi16

    mmi16 TrainBoard Member

    289
    118
    20
    Raising bridges to higher levels is a massive undertaking as the right of way on both sides of the bridge must also be raised to maintain a grade line that trains can still operate on.

    It appears that this bridge was built across a rather wide flood plain and to raise it would be a massive undertaking.
     
  19. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    60,932
    5,766
    651
    Yes. Just considering that such events seem to be occurring and may well yet again. If replaced to original, another debris flow as seen cannot be ruled out. How do they avoid repeat of damage or another washout, with the lost traffic revenues thereafter? Do they rebuild as it was, tempting fate? Or try to somehow mitigate future possibilities? Regrading the approaches, I understand. I am thinking that any piers involved may be harmed and need to be upgraded or replaced, so raising them at this time is possible or may be necessary.

    I actually have some awareness of the needs and logistics involved. I once was employed by an engineering firm which did contract work for a major transcontinental RR, and also flood control related projects for the Corps of Engineers. The latter was rather interesting.... :)
     
    Hardcoaler likes this.
  20. Hardcoaler

    Hardcoaler TrainBoard Member

    5,071
    11,665
    88
    I can also envision NS's Purchasing Agent on the phone with a bridge supplier, "eh, um, I need a railroad bridge about 400 FT long ready to ship Tuesday and I need your best price."
     

Share This Page