NYC feedwater heaters

LEW May 29, 2002

  1. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    The Question asked by fitz.
    Which NYC engines were equipped with injectors and feedwater heaters
    It seems all had feedwater heaters
    of some brand or other. Did any have
    two injectors besides the feedwater
    heaters?

    I am going to start out explaining
    two things for those that may not be
    familiar with locomotives.
    We have superheaters,and feedwater
    heaters.
    Superheaters were u shaped steam
    pipes that run back into the big
    or, upper flues to heat the steam
    above the temperature it was coming
    from in the boiler.This made a hotter and drier steam into the cylinders.
    Feedwater heaters were used to heat
    the water between the tank and the
    boiler.
    To answer the first question.Most
    H-5 did not have feedwater heaters.
    The H-5v made for the IHB did but
    some were given to the B4 and they were taken off.
    The H-7 was not equipped until about the # 1989.It was still a hit
    and miss on which engines had them
    above this number until the H-10.
    Also the H-6,we called them government engines, were not equipped.From the H-10 on up they
    had feedwater heaters.A few yard
    engines were equipped but most were
    not.
    Did any have two injectors besides
    the feedwater heaters? No.
    The government required two methods
    to supply the boiler.Two injectors,
    or a water pump and injector.They
    must both be working leaving the
    enginehouse.We had a 1hr.delay on
    a yard engine because of a leaking
    boiler check valve.The check valve
    was letting steam blow back into the
    injector and it would not work.The
    engineer would not leave until it
    was repaired.After they fussed for
    45 min. it only took 10 min. to grind in the boiler check valve.
    If you are viewing from the firemans side you will see a water
    pump and not an injector when the
    engine has a feedwater heater.An
    injector would not supply enough
    water to supply the demand of a seperate feedwater heater.
    That said,they did have an Elesco
    exhaust steam injector and it was
    a feedwater heater and again I don't
    think it was as efficient.I never
    operated one so this is a little
    guess work.
    On the engineers side was the injector.Most were non lifting but
    not all.Non lifting was below the
    water in the tank and the lifting
    was above the water level in the
    tank,the lifting injector located on the
    boiler, inside or outside the cab.
    So all engines from about 1906
    were superheated, but not all had
    feedwater heaters. LEW
     
  2. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,713
    2,750
    145
    Lew thanks for that information and answers to my question. [​IMG]
     
  3. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    My son told me today that he saw a model of an H-6 189? that was equipped with a feedwater heater.
    There were pictures of the real life
    engine equipped and one after it was removed.I don't have any other details.We do know they were not equipped when built.NYC must have
    been testing. LEW
     
  4. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,713
    2,750
    145
    LEW, It seems like NYC was always testing something. Do you have experience/opinions about the relative merits of the different feedwater heaters? Seems like the Hudsons had Elesco to begin with, then Worthington, and maybe even Coffin at times. I remember learning some had contact with steam directly where others were physically isolated water from steam. I forgot the terms used for those two variants. :confused:
     
  5. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    From the firemans point of view the
    feedwater heaters merits did not
    play a part of his work.His cocern
    was could the pump supply the boiler
    All of the different types of feed-
    water heater pumps did this except
    one and under one condition.
    The 2900s had the Elesco feedwater
    heater with the reciprocating pump.
    If you were having trouble keeping
    steam,as the steam pressure dropped
    the steam pressure to the pump also
    dropped.If the engineer could not
    ease up on the throttle it then turned into a case of trading water
    for steam.If your fire defect could
    be corrected by trading water for
    steam a couple of times,ok but if the steam did not pick up after that
    could get in serious trouble.These
    engines used more water than the
    other 4-8-2s.
    I personally think the Worthington
    had the best pump.
    I think the terms you are thinking of are open and closed.
    With the Elesco the water run through tubes and the exhaust steam
    flowed around them.On the Worthing-
    ton which is open it is like a com-
    mode tank.As the water supply goes
    down the float drops and lets exhaust steam and water fill the
    tank again to the proper level. The
    steam heating the water as it comes
    in. LEW
     
  6. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,713
    2,750
    145
    Open vs. Closed. Thanks for reminding me. That situation of having to choose water vs. steam is one I hadn't thought about much. Kind of like a catch-22? I think I'd rather sacrifice the fire than risk letting the crown sheet get dry. [​IMG]
     
  7. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,981
    6,969
    183
    LEW, Thanks very much for that explanation of feedwater heaters and injectors. I had never understood their mechanics before.
     
  8. Johnny Trains

    Johnny Trains Passed away April 29, 2004 In Memoriam

    1,278
    0
    28
    Feedwater heaters were added later on to Berks weren't they?
     
  9. LEW

    LEW TrainBoard Member

    359
    56
    24
    The Berks came from the factory
    with feedwater heaters.These engines
    were a part of the super power locos
    that came from the 2-8-2 H-10.The
    early Berks had Elesco feedwater
    heaters and I think from the C series they were equipped with Coffin feedwater heaters. LEW
     
  10. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,713
    2,750
    145
    Yeah, who could mistake that Elesco heater tank on the smokebox front of the 1400 Berkshires. Often referred to as "heavy-browed." From what I was able to learn, you are right, LEW, the A-1C's had Coffin, as did the last 9400's for P&LE. Too bad they're all gone. :(
     

Share This Page