Funny looking cab!

ElStuddo Nov 20, 2006

  1. ElStuddo

    ElStuddo TrainBoard Member

    10
    0
    11
    I guess CSX made these extinct. I guess other railroads didnt want to bother with this. I find it kinna roomy looking. I wonder what it looks like on the inside? What was so bad about these they only made so many of?.....

    http://www.trainweb.org/csxphotos/html/BQ23-7.html

    [​IMG]
     
  2. BnOEngrRick

    BnOEngrRick TrainBoard Member

    714
    235
    28
    That was Family Lines attempt to pack a five man crew in an engine after the cabooses came off. Very cramped. I ran a couple of these on CSX, and my knees were up against the front cab wall. Very uncomfortable after a short period of time, unbearable after 12 hours.
     
  3. Stourbridge Lion

    Stourbridge Lion TrainBoard Supporter

    16,680
    131
    184
    How would it have been if they had fixed that issue?
     
  4. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    I guess the reason this didn't catch on was that it came too late. The 5-man crew was soon to be gone.

    I believe this cab was offered as an option on all Dash 7s.

    I also believe fitting the whole crew in the engine was the rationale behind BN's "GP50L"s: http://www.trainpix.com/BN/EMDORIG/GP50/3159.HTM Even rarer than the BQ23-7 (only five were built), but rather less interesting.
     
  5. Big Al

    Big Al TrainBoard Member

    148
    0
    20
    There were 10 BQ23-7s built for Family Lines (SCL)
    They were the first units I ever saw to have strobe lights on the roof.

    Maine Central rebuilt a GP7 with a similar cab since the 5 man crew was slower to depart the MEC.
     
  6. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    I recall having seen several photos of one or more Geeps with the nose apparently replaced by a second cab, judging by the side windows. They looked remarkably hideous.
     
  7. ElStuddo

    ElStuddo TrainBoard Member

    10
    0
    11

    How bout when ATSF did THEIR share? Looks like they had them in greater numbers, but like the others, I dont think they too exist, courtesey of BNSF...

    http://www.rr-fallenflags.org/atsf/atsf-20.html

    [​IMG]

    Then again ATSF had some really strange & complex designs throughout their era. :shade:
     
  8. YoHo

    YoHo TrainBoard Supporter

    5,508
    2,011
    98
    That's a CF7 which is a completely different beast.

    Those GP50Ls spent a lot of time on Garbage train duty in the Gorge a couple of years ago, so I don't really think of them as rare. I saw em all the time.
     
  9. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,917
    3,725
    137
    Just a thought:
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 22, 2006
  10. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    All CF7s were retired by ATSF in the 80s, long before BNSF. Many went on to second careers on shortlines - some even became switchers for Amtrak.
     
  11. BNSF FAN

    BNSF FAN TrainBoard Supporter

    10,061
    30,269
    153
    I remember reading years ago in Trains or Railfan or such that the crews didn't feel safe in the BQ units and after some RR and BLE negotiating, the units were pretty much relegated to trailing unit status. In turn, that was the nail in the coffin for future BQ units.
     
  12. Krasny Strela

    Krasny Strela TrainBoard Member

    121
    1
    15
    It looks very eastern european or chinese. Actually now it looks like the units GE just made for the tibetan line.
     
  13. Burlington Northern Fan

    Burlington Northern Fan TrainBoard Supporter

    456
    690
    27
    The Santa Fe was Just STRANGE AND COMPLEX!!!!!
     
  14. chessie

    chessie TrainBoard Supporter

    6,183
    7
    79
    I used to catch the BQ23-7's on occasion in their heyday.... I think I even have photos of them with their cabs plated over and labeled "B Unit service only"....

    Harold
     
  15. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44

Share This Page