NYC Handsome J-3 from 1947

fitz Oct 5, 2015

  1. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    I haven't started a NYC thread for some time, so here is a J-3 Hudson from the Harold Vollrath collection, shot in Chicago in 1947.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,985
    7,000
    183
    Jim, this photo of 5445, other than being of an absolutely beautiful machine, shows two things that I never knew, or at least may have forgotten long ago. First is the graphite smoke box paint. Maybe the K's, J-2's, and rare F's that roamed the Harlem were always dirty, but I sure don't remember a change of color between the boiler and smoke box. Second, is the taller firebox top (compared to the boiler) unique to J-3's? I don't remember this on the ex-B&A J-2's that the Harlem acquired late in life.

    (My apologies to the North White maintenance crew for even considering that they may have ever allowed a "dirty" locomotive out of their shop for general service. :cry:)
     
  3. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Hank, as far as I have been able to determine, that taller thing is just a sheet metal cover for the steam manifold that is just forward of the cab. That structure seemed to "grow" as new models of Alco locos came out. As far as the graphite goes, I don't know the answer. It may have to do with what NYC shop last serviced the locomotive. Your memory of B&A J-2's--the B&A took pride in the look of the front of their Hudsons and if I remember right, they painted them silver.
     
  4. Doug Gosha

    Doug Gosha TrainBoard Member

    3,621
    7,775
    80
    If I may invent a new word, that locomotive is a beauhemoth. Just so huge but gorgeous!

    Doug
     
  5. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,317
    50,534
    253
    When my Dad was stationed in Korea in the mid 1950s he picked up an HO brass Tenshoto model of one of those. It followed us around all over the globe until in 1983, he finally built his layout. Only problem was, he decided to model the Santa Fe. So, like a good son, I painted it up for him. Oh well....sigh....
    [​IMG]
     
    Hardcoaler and FriscoCharlie like this.
  6. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Russell, Santa Fe had handsome Hudsons, too, but that model is certainly based on a New York Central 4-6-4. I think the coal in the tender might be one of the many dead giveaways. ATSFs burned oil. Ironically, as a Marx kid, when I finally got a Hudson as a kid, it was a Marx plastic ATSF Hudson. Sheeesh, for one living in the back yard of the New York Central.
     
  7. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,317
    50,534
    253
    Santa Fe burned a lot of coal depending on the division where they ran. Especially between Chicago and La Junta where their Hudsons reigned. The 3450 class Hudsons were built as coal burners but were eventually converted to oil. Here is an ATSF Mikado in Chicago with a full load.
    [​IMG]
     
    Hardcoaler likes this.
  8. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    I stand corrected. So many of the western roads gave up on coal.
     
  9. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,317
    50,534
    253
    It depended on the cost and availability of the different fuels. In Texas and California, oil ruled. The ATSF transcon was a mixed bag. Big coal tipples in Chicago, Kansas City and New Mexico. The SP even used coal in parts of New Mexico.
     
  10. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,317
    50,534
    253
    Here is the coal tipple in Gallup, New Mexico along with three coal burning Mikados.
    [​IMG]

    And yet here we have some oil burners parked in front of the coal tipple at the Argentine Yard in Kansas City. I believe they are taking on sand.
    [​IMG]

    OK, I guess I am done hi-jacking this thread. Back to NYC Husdsons. ;)
     
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2015
    fitz, Hardcoaler and FriscoCharlie like this.
  11. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,985
    7,000
    183
    Russell, don't apologize for posting those great photos. You merely have thrown down the gauntlet for Roger and Jim to locate and post similar NYC photos. ;)
     
  12. Doug Gosha

    Doug Gosha TrainBoard Member

    3,621
    7,775
    80
    I have a Con-Cor N scale NYC/ATSF J3a Hudson.

    :D

    Doug
     
    Hardcoaler likes this.
  13. Mike Kmetz

    Mike Kmetz TrainBoard Member

    505
    32
    28
    Regarding the graphite smokebox paint....
    The firebox was too hot for ordinary pigmented paint - it would burn off.
    That is why graphite paint was used there.
    Depending on the formulation, the graphite paint could look black or somewhat silver.
    The NYC standard was the black graphite, although the B&A tended to use the silver.
    There could also have been variations between the shops that applied the coating.
     
  14. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Wish I had some of those old coal tipples in use, but I don't. Might have some of them out of service. Here is a shot from our old friend Ron who once contributed to the NYCS site. I have lost contact with him. Hudson getting sand loaded in the sand dome.

    RONHUDS1.jpg
     
    r_i_straw likes this.
  15. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Here is one of Niagara Class S, the only one built with poppet valves, 5500. I guess we can imagine that the water tank in the background has been accessed to feed the tender, through that spout that is obviously being used just for that task.
    Photo by Lamar Kelly, from the collection of Bob Spaugh, Englewood, ILL.

    5500A.JPG
     
  16. rhensley_anderson

    rhensley_anderson TrainBoard Supporter

    1,494
    1,244
    45
    October 27, 1940
    Lafayette, Indiana CCCStL class " J-1d " 4-6-4 Hudson #5377
    Roger Hensley Collection

    [​IMG]
     
  17. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,985
    7,000
    183
    Jim, are there any records that compare 5500's efficiency with her S-1 sisters? Had not 5500's poppet valve experiment occurred so late in steam development (1947?), I'm sure we would have seen more S-2s built.
     
  18. dti406

    dti406 TrainBoard Member

    1,408
    11,567
    56
    Please note that #5445 was a de-streamlined Dreyfus Hudson, so some of the appliances were set up to be accessible from under the streamlining. This may have been the maiden voyage after the removal.
     
  19. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,317
    50,534
    253
    Did it look sort of like this one?
    Hudson5426.jpg
     
  20. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,714
    2,756
    145
    Lots of good stuff here. Roger, nice doubleheader shot! That was rare, unless motive power was being moved to other locations. Hank, knowing how the Central tested their locomotives, I am sure S-1 vs. S-2 comparison data was collected, but I don't have any and am not sure where to find it. Maybe Tom Gerbracht of the NYCSHS has some--he has posted some great technical data in the Central Headlight in the past. Russell, that particular Hudson, 5426, along with 5429 was uniquely streamlined for the Empire State Express to match the corregated steel of the passenger consist. 5446 was a 20th Century Limited loco, and would have looked more like 5450, another Vollrath photo. Half of them had Boxpok drivers and half had Scullin Disks like 5450. Let's keep this going!! It's fun!

    HKV5450sm.jpg
     

Share This Page