Shrouded RS1?

virtual-bird May 26, 2005

  1. virtual-bird

    virtual-bird TrainBoard Member

    1,034
    0
    33
  2. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,722
    23,370
    653
    Believe they only existed on the Alaska RR. Supposedly due to the climate. Done in their own shops.

    :D

    Boxcab E50
     
  3. NP/GNBill

    NP/GNBill TrainBoard Supporter

    1,087
    236
    30
    Wow, that is one weird looking unit. I've never seen one before. [​IMG]
     
  4. Thirdrail

    Thirdrail In Memoriam

    1,201
    0
    25
    After World War II, the Alaska Railroad, being owned by the Federal Government, became the "dumping ground" for surplus military railroad equipment. During World War II, all RS1's went to the US Army. In order to use these RS1's in the Alaskan climate, they were "shrouded". The Army originally intended to use Diesels like the RS1 in desert areas where water for steam locomotives was hard to get, so they were designed to withstand desert heat, not Arctic cold.
     
  5. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    238
    125
    According to the 1972 edition of Diesel Spotters Guide, there were eighteen of them, in A&B units. The first two were converted by International Railway Car & Equip. Mfg. in Kenton, Ohio; 3 As and 4 Bs were converted by Puget Sound Bridge and Dredge Co., Seattle. These have a different look to them. The rest were presumably converted by the railroad--so there might be a third look.

    Interesting look!
     
  6. LongTrain

    LongTrain Passed away October 12, 2005 In Memoriam

    803
    0
    19
    There appears to be a second unit in a different paint job in the photo, coupled behind the unit in the foreground.

    Compare the radiator grilles at the rear of the the unit in the foreground with the unit coupled behind it. There may be a "porthole" showing, too.
     
  7. Mr.Wrinkles

    Mr.Wrinkles E-Mail Bounces

    108
    0
    15
    It must only be an Alaskan adventure [​IMG] (The Final Frontier).
     
  8. Pete Nolan

    Pete Nolan TrainBoard Supporter

    10,587
    238
    125
    It appears the Ohio-built have no portholes in the A unit and one in the B unit, while the Seattle A units have four portholes. I have no picture of the Seattle B unit.

    I've seen, somewhere, a picture of what I think was the home-built unit. I remember it being quite the ugly duckling.
     
  9. virtual-bird

    virtual-bird TrainBoard Member

    1,034
    0
    33
    Ok.. its on ;) LOL.. PM me an address to send a loco or 2 to if your serious Mr.


    http://www.trainboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi/ubb/get_topic/f/9/t/006004.html?

    http://www.alaskarails.org/glance/complete-roster.html
    They are known as RF1A and RF1B


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    Credit where it is due.
    This one is in HO by Pat Durand
    http://alaskamodelrrnews.homestead.com/Alco.html

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  10. Big Snooze

    Big Snooze TrainBoard Member

    346
    0
    15
    Those is a superb model by Mr. Durand. These would be a real neat opportunity for a manufacturer of resin shells (hint, hint).
     
  11. John Moore

    John Moore TrainBoard Supporter

    13,443
    12,366
    183
    In the winter storms the acculmulation of ice and snow would prevent crews from opening the access doors to the engine compartment, etc. The full width body allowed crew access to punch a reset or perform another chore to keep a unit running.

    One of the reasons the GN went to the F-45 loco was for crew access in the winter.
     
  12. Gats

    Gats TrainBoard Member

    4,122
    23
    59
    An interesting looking unit, no doubt.

    Far more shrouded than I would have imagined, Bruce. That's no kitbash - it's a scratchbuilt item.

    I think I'll pass, thanks. Too many of my own things to do.
     
  13. virtual-bird

    virtual-bird TrainBoard Member

    1,034
    0
    33
    No worries Mr.. It looked like the challenge from hell. just got home after posting this reply, and lookin at the RS1 infront of me at the moment!

    but if ya can find that GP shell that would be sweet.
     
  14. Powersteamguy1790

    Powersteamguy1790 Permanently dispatched

    10,785
    11
    115
    It does look different.


    Stay cool and run steam..... [​IMG] :cool: :cool:
     
  15. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,919
    3,745
    137
    Nice, ugly, nice, ugly, nice and ugly.
    Love it.
     
  16. BoxcabE50

    BoxcabE50 HOn30 & N Scales Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    67,722
    23,370
    653
    I'd have to give an award out, for the effort made in scratchbuilding something so unique.

    [​IMG]

    Boxcab E50
     
  17. WHOPPIT

    WHOPPIT TrainBoard Member

    427
    0
    16
    I kinda like it, mind you i like the loco that Ingalls built to!
     
  18. Grey One

    Grey One TrainBoard Supporter

    8,919
    3,745
    137
    "unique" _and_ ugly.
    Man, I love it.

    Whoppit - I loved them also. Unique, wierd and ugly.

    Then again, I like boxcabs so.
     
  19. John Moore

    John Moore TrainBoard Supporter

    13,443
    12,366
    183
    HMM take an Alco FA shell, a F-3-7-9 shell, a old cheapo RS-11 mechanism or maybe an RS-1.

    HMMM.
     
  20. WHOPPIT

    WHOPPIT TrainBoard Member

    427
    0
    16
    strange, when you think of the classic lines of the E and F units, the PA series, C-liners etc but theres something about bulky looking locos that i like. Trainmasters, BL2's, GP30S may not look the prettiest but man they just look like brutes even sat stationary!
     

Share This Page