Those black and white days of steam - BR 2-10-0

Alan Dec 26, 2006

  1. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    The British Railways Standard 2-10-0 was the most successful standard design. Although they were designed for heavy and fast freight use, on occasion they ran parcels trains up to 90 mph, even though they only had 5ft diameter wheels!

    However, fist up is a non-standard one! Ten locomotives were built with 'Crosti' boilers. This was a second boiler below the main one which used the flue gasses again, the exhaust was emitted from an ejector on the right side of the loco half way down the boiler! These locomotives were not successful and were converted back to standard configuration.

    Here is 92026 after losing the Crosti boiler, backing down to pick up a freight at Wakefield in 1966.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    Later, the same loco returns with the freight train it has collected.

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    This is 92077 at Newton Heath Motive Power Depot, Manchester in 1966. This is a standard loco!

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    92173 passing Gosberton heading to East Anglia with a coal train in 1961.

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    92189 passing Gosberton with another southbound coal train, this time in 1963.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    92213 at Banbury in the last days of steam in 1965. Note the lamp has been moved to the smokebox in a lower position so the crew member changing the lamp is not close to overhead live catenary when working on electrified lines.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    92224 also at Banbury in 1965.

    There were 250 of these popular and efficient machines constructed, but some only lasted a few years before diesels replaced all steam. :(

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Hytec

    Hytec TrainBoard Member

    13,981
    6,968
    183
    Aha, external monkey-motion to appease the Maintenance Dept. :angel:

    Alan, I'm surprised to see such a small tender for such a large locomotive. Was this decision due to the short turntables throughout the system? Otherwise, it would seem inefficient to replenish the tender every few hundred miles.....?
     
  9. Thirdrail

    Thirdrail In Memoriam

    1,201
    0
    25
    Every few hundred miles, Hank?? In the USA it was common to refill the water cistern on tenders every 25 miles and recoal every 100 miles. The British did have an extensive system of track pans, allowing water to be replenished "on the fly". PRR, NYC, and B&O were the only major users of track pans in the USA. :cat:
     
  10. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    There were several different tenders fitted to BR Standard designs. On the 9F's above, there are two different styles, high sided or inset bunker. The coal and water capacities varied according to the area of use of the locomotives.

    Also remember that freight runs are very much shorter here in the UK than in the US. ;)
     
  11. fitz

    fitz TrainBoard Member

    9,713
    2,750
    145
    Alan, that's a great presentation. Are there any of the class surviving, either operating or on display somewhere? :confused2:
     
  12. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    There are a number in preservation. Some have run on main line excursion trains. :)
     
  13. r_i_straw

    r_i_straw Mostly N Scale Staff Member

    22,292
    50,350
    253
    My daughter who is living in York sent me a deck of cards with locomotives on them. I believe this is the same class of loco on all the Jacks. :)
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Triplex

    Triplex TrainBoard Member

    3,214
    1
    44
    So I presume the short tender holds mostly coal.
     
  15. Alan

    Alan Staff Member TrainBoard Supporter

    10,798
    460
    127
    The water capacity varied between the different tender types, between 4725 and 5625 gallons.
     

Share This Page